TREES ON BOUNDARIES
LOSS TO PRODUCTION .An unusual request came before the Executive of the N.Z. Farmers' Union (Auckland Province) at its last meeting when a letter was received from the Thames District Council of Primary. Production suggesting that the Union should take action in regard to the loss of production on certain farms due to boundary trees. It was stated that on the Hauraki Plains area some farmers had been adversely affected by trees planted on their neighbour's boundary and that they had no redress at law. The Thames body considered that a farmer who suffered from this cause should be giv-> en the right to state a case in court asking compensation when his land, was adversely affected and that the. proposed legislation should also give the court power to trees to be removed. In the ensuing dis,cus.-» sion it was stated that in some cases several acres were detrimentally effected. The acting Mr Scott Davidson, expressed the view that it would be difficult to deal with such matters through the Courts —an attempt to settle them by private co-operation wouljd certainly be preferable. ......
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19460104.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 9, Issue 36, 4 January 1946, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
186TREES ON BOUNDARIES Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 9, Issue 36, 4 January 1946, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Beacon Printing and Publishing Company is the copyright owner for the Bay of Plenty Beacon. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Beacon Printing and Publishing Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.