Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OPOSSUM DESTRUCTION

BOUNTY DESIRED FARMERS ALARMED i I In the Opotiki district and other parts of the Bay of Plenty the opossum is gradually working down out of the bush and wherever this little animal goes it leaves a trail of de,- 1 struction, particularly in orchards. Farmers of the Gisborne district are so alarmed over the destructive habits of the opossum and the increase in their numbers; that the Cook County Council last week decided to make a second approach to the Internal Affairs: Department with a view to securing the removal of all restrictions, on the destruction of opossums, together with the payment of a bounty to encourage their slaughter. This decision followed the reading of a reply from the Under-Sec-retary of the department to a previous letter from the council which advocated similar measures. In the East Coast acclimatisation district, the department's letter stated, opossums could be taken all the year round by occupiers of property or bona fide employees, provided they first obtained a permit from the secretary of the East Coast Acclimatisation Socicty in Gisborne. No fee was payable for the permit, which must be issued by the secretary, provided he was satisfied that the facts, in the application were correct. Once issued, a permit was good until specifically revoked. Provisions regarding payment of royalty and trappers' statements remained. Mr M. T. B. iial 1 considered that the facilities at present available, as outlined, in the letter,, were not sufficient. No permits should be necessary and every encouragement be given to secure the destruction of the opossums. Mr F. S. Brown expressed the opinion lhat the present provisions were necessary. Farmers in some areas had a similar problem with boats, but he knew of no farmers ■who had been refused ammunition to shoot them. Mr P. D. Tomblcson said that in some instances property owners did not want to secure permits, but killed the. opossums whenever they saw them. The previous suggestion made by the council that a bounty should be provided should be repeated, for unless some incentive was given for their destruction there would not be a sufficient reduction in the numbers. The council agreed to make a request for the removal of all protection and the granting of a bounty.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19431102.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 7, Issue 20, 2 November 1943, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
378

OPOSSUM DESTRUCTION Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 7, Issue 20, 2 November 1943, Page 3

OPOSSUM DESTRUCTION Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 7, Issue 20, 2 November 1943, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert