Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAIMANA RIVER DIVERSION

Sir, —Although the chairman stated at the Council meeting that he had been unaware of any secrecy in connection with the river diversion, he omitted to mention to his fellow councillors the circumstances of how the job was undertaken by the coun* cil. Because of this omission to tell the whole story perhaps you will allow me space to tell the ratepayers how their rates can be needlessly expended by a riding member. - < The plain facts .about this are that the property* owner concerned —Mr H. Wardlaw— com'fcaenced operations with a scoop, and horse team to divert the course of the river from his property where it had caused very considerable erosion and was working in towards his house and cowshed. A few days work proved that it was too big an undertaking for a scoop and horse team. The outcome of a consultation with the Riding member of the council was that it became a county operation alleged to protect a road and bridge. Although this was my outlet road and concerned no other ratepayer I was not consulted in any way. The arrangements were made between the Riding councillor, Mr R. Wardlaw, and the adjoining property owners Messrs H. and T. W. Wardlaw. The undertaking has cost the ratepayers over £120, while the protection of road and bridge could have been adequately carried out as a safe permanent job by willow planting—* for less than £20. Three years ago a Government grant of £120 was lost to the ratepayers by the questionable methods adopted by the Rid ing member in obtaining special advantages for the adjoining property owner. I think the lime is overdue for an investigation by a Government official into the manner of the expen* diture of the County and Government funds; in the Waimana riding with a view to ensuring that all the ratepayers will participate in the benefits instead of a favoured few. There are a number of glaring examples in the district of county as-, sets deteriorating for want of attention—requiring only the expenditure of a few pounds—but in regard to these we are blandly told there is no money available to do the work. Yours etc., G. KIRKBRIDE. Waimana, 11/11/41.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19411114.2.13.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 180, 14 November 1941, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
371

WAIMANA RIVER DIVERSION Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 180, 14 November 1941, Page 4

WAIMANA RIVER DIVERSION Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 180, 14 November 1941, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert