Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOSPITAL AFFAIRS

Sir, —From time to time we read in our local a few very hard words from our County Council room, in reference to our hospital. The last two by Councillor McCready in your issue of June 27. He says once you hardly saw a native in the hospital. This did apply to the white people of this district.. [I would be very interesting to know if such remarks call for class distinction. After many years spent ir this district, apparently he has no record of past expansion of our hospital. Is it correct to say the hospital was firstly a native hostpital. The first addition I can remember was a woman's ward of about fou? rooms, this was some 22 years ago; and remains part of our present hos pital buildings. Another point might be of interest. When the first portion of our present hospital waa built, in about the year 1923, one very often heard the following words: "Our hospital board are mad. they arei building a Avhite elephant." Yet what additions in buildings and staff before the election in 1938, the year most of our present social services started to effect our hospital at all. Second point is the! only way to get the native out of ou? hospital is to burn it down. Oh what a statement to come from such a public man. It would be very interesting to know how such a person asi Councillor McCready can link up such statements when at the same council table to Avhich he belongs the following was reported for its April meeting of the' year 1939: "•The council now supported a free hospital." One thing is left open, the fingers point to no reason, or person who has to carry the burden of-his words. It would be very interesting to know if the words are directed against the ability of our hospital board, o? the hospital staff, by not knowing at what stage to give a native a

discharge. If he does not cast any reflection upon these two, who then must carry the baby. It is to be hoped our hospital board will not let such remarks go unchallenged, as all ratexiayers aro effected by such wild statements. Yours etc., HARRY CARR.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19410702.2.12.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 124, 2 July 1941, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
377

HOSPITAL AFFAIRS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 124, 2 July 1941, Page 4

HOSPITAL AFFAIRS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 124, 2 July 1941, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert