Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGES DISMISSED

TWO YOUNG MEN IN COURT . COSTS IMPOSED When two young men, James: Warren Anderson Roper and Leo Trevor Simpson appeared in the local court before Messrs G. A. Brabant and J. G. Mulliolland, J's.P. yesterday charges of wij fully damaging a window and being unlawfully on

premises were dismissed, the young men being ordered to pay court costs and told lhat they had behaved foolishly.

On a recent Saturday evening,, according to Mir Leonard El Evans, of Piripai, a car had stopped, footsteps had been heard rounding his house and then the household had been disturbed by the breaking of a window. He staled that the two voung men in court had been guests at his house, Simpson frequently and Roper on a couple of occasions. He had given instructions to his family that the latter was not to be admitted.

The young men denied having wilfully damaged the window. They had both wished to visit the house, Roper to speak to Miss Eivans and Simpson to Mr Evans son. As they rounded the house they had knocked at Miss Evans window with the unexpected result that the glass broke. Frightened at what they had done they had run away, later resolving to return, repair the damage, and explain. Before they had done so the matter had been reported to the police. Simpson claimed to be a friend of the family and a frequent visitor, while Roper stated that he had been made welcome by Mrs and Miss Evans and had seen Miss Evans

frequently. Mr G. O'tley appeared for the young men vnd pleaded tlVit they had not been on the premises unlawfully and had no intention of damaging the window. He felt that the charges were trivial in that both defendants had been made welcome at the house had not been told to keep away. The Bench stated that the young men had not intended to commit a crime, but had been foolish and illmannered in their approach to tlv, house.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19410219.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 273, 19 February 1941, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

CHARGES DISMISSED Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 273, 19 February 1941, Page 5

CHARGES DISMISSED Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 273, 19 February 1941, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert