Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LONG HEARING

THE WHAKATANE MILLS

600 SHEETS OF EVIDENCE

The hearing of the application by Whakatane Paper Mills, Limited, to the Price Investigation Tribunal for permission to increase its prices, which concluded this week s occupied 10 days, each of five hours. There were bOO foolscap sheets of typed evidence, each of which averaged 500 words, making a grand total of 30,000 words. Four typists working in half-hour relays noted the questions and answers, submissions of counsel and remarks of the members of the tribunal, Mr Justice Hunter and Mr H. L. Wise. These notes were made available to the Court and counsel within an hour of their being takfcn. While there is no known price for the supply of evidence in such a proceeding, this being the first [public hearing of the Price Tribunal. the supply of such evidence to parties in Supreme Court proceedings would probably cost at least £50. Approximately 2400 folios of the proceedings were taken, one set each for the tribunal and counsel. High Legal Costs. The legal costs will probably be among the highest in any proceedings because of the time involved not only in the case but in the preparation. Further, the company has the expense of its executive officers, a number of whom w T ere present for the whole of the inquiry, in the matter of hotel accommodation for a fortnight. In addition there arc travelling expenses. When the hearing was concluded Mr Justice Hnnter remarked that none of the 600 pages of evidence was light reading. Most of it dealt with accounts and required close study. The tribunal would set to work in all its free time toward giv ing a decision as quickly as it could. In this decision it would attempt to take into account all the relevant circumstances disclosed in the 10 days' hearing. He expressed appreciation to counsel for the ablcwav in which the case was put and also to the expert witnesses, who had put in a considerable amount of time in the preparation of their evidence. He appreciated the evidence of all, particularly the Crown experts, because he realised the long hours of preparatory work entailed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19400301.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 130, 1 March 1940, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

LONG HEARING Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 130, 1 March 1940, Page 5

LONG HEARING Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 130, 1 March 1940, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert