Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HARBOUR RECLAMATION

THREATENED BEAUTY.

RAILWAY PLANS FEARED.

HOBSON BAY PROSPECT. (By Telegraph.—Parliamentary Reporter.) WELLINGTON, Wednesday.

That no further reclamation for railway purposes nor other public works be allowed in Hobson Bay is the request of 200 petitioners whose petition was presented to the House of Representatives by Mr. J. S. Dickson (Parnell). The list is headed by the Mayor and Town Clerk of Auckland, Archbishop Averill, and Bishop Cleary, and is supported by the heads of other religious denominations, the president of the Auckland University College, the president of the Chamber of Commerce, the [Mayors of Newmarket, Mount Eden, Devonport, and Onehunga. Petitioners have been informed that the Railway Department proposes to construct railway works other than the through line already in Hobson Bay, and they ask that such work be prohibited, because the eastern Auckland suburbs are almost exclusively residential, substantially garden suburbs, and their chief attraction is the extraordinary natural beauty of the prospect over the Waitemata and Hauraki Gulf. Two more paragraphs comment on the scenic value of the prospect over Hobson Bay, which petitioners fear may be disfigured both from land and sea, as further reclamation will tend to the creation of an industrial area in front of the attractive suburbs.

"For many years," they state, "by reclamation and public works the beautiful sea front of Auckland has been gradually altered in character and spoiled in appearance, and it is desirable that further operations of this character should be abandoned. The Government, by passing the Town Planning Act, have expressly recognised the wisdom and public duty of preserving objects of natural beauty, and of separating industrial from residential areas. The construction of such works will constitute a V i°iu* lon fundamental principles of the Town Planning Act, because of the disfigurement of the waterfront and of S! 18 in . t i r^ rence the ameniB* 05 the neighbourhood/*

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19280920.2.106

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 223, 20 September 1928, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
312

HARBOUR RECLAMATION Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 223, 20 September 1928, Page 10

HARBOUR RECLAMATION Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 223, 20 September 1928, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert