Untitled

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1684, 12 July 1875, Page 3

DISTRICT COURT. -This Day. (Before His Honor Judge Beckham.) Judgments fok plaintiff. Robert Cranwell & Co. v. A. G. Oldfield (Mr. Heeketh for plaintiff) claim £58 0s Id cost £5 6s Od. superintendent of auckland v. Thomas h, Smith. Claim £27. Mr. Alexander for plaintiff. «This was a claim for the rent and occupation of a house in which defendant admitted the claim, but was unable to settle at once; he would pay by weekly instalments. His Honor suggested an arrangement between the parties, and gave judgment for plaintiff. AUCKLAND IMPROVEMENT COMMISSIONERS V. WILLIAM GILL, ARCH. TtTDEHGPB, AND JOHN HARKER. Claim £100 trover. Mr. Lusk for plaintiff. Mr. Devore for defendants. The particulars of this cause appeared a fortnight ago in our police report in reference to the removal of a portion of the drill shed without the sanction of the commissioners. The defendants did not deny the facts, but pleaded simple justification. * After some discussion on the matter in dispute, the case.was adjourned until to-mor-row. ADJOURNED CASES. 11,,?- Taylor v' Joseph Wilkins, b6l 18s Bd, action for damages. Wm. McCommons v. R. H. Bartlett, ciaim £23 17s 3d g,°°-ds J «™chael Kellv v- Ebenexer Gibbons, claim £90 wages, also, the following cases of appeal, S. Y. Collins v. Thos. Macffarlane, and James Morton v. Stannus Jones. John so«i7* c S harlf and Geor«e Clark > ol»»» *25 lls 6d,work and aerricM rendered.