Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.— THIS DAY.

(Before Thomas Beckham, Esq., E.M.) JUDGMENTS FOR PLAINTIFFS. Judgments were given for plaintiffs as follows :—R. Collins vW, Williams, £8 ss, seven weeks wages at £5 a month, aboard the cutter Wangarei ; judgment for £5 with costs. C. Langsford vG. Bermett, £7 3s, and the same v J. Anderson, £3 6s, claim for wearing apparel. W. Swanson vR. Atkinson, £15, balance of promissory note. MESSES SOPPET V. THOMAS MOORE. Claim £10 7s, balance of account. Mr Hesketh for plaintiff, Mr Joy for defendant. Thomas Moore, farmer of Pukekobe deposed that he had dealt with plaintiff for flour &c, but that he had made a financial settlement in 1868, and did not admit any item since that date. The original account was £95 12s. The case was dismissed for want of jurisdiction and that the case might be brought before the District Court. WILLIAM N. CLARKE V. JOHN; M'HESLEY. Claim £4 8s 6d. Mr Thome for plaintiff and Mr Joy for defendants. The parties in this case had been friends, and plaintiff had been supplying defendant with table-cloths, napkins, and other domestic articles, in lieu of which defendant found plaintiff in food and lodging at the rate 20s per week. They had gone on comfortably together, until a little misunderstanding arose, and plaintiff brought the case in Court, against which defendant claimed a set off. After a great deal of difficulty in getting the differences into shape, it was shewn bhat defendant was indebted in a balance of £1 4s 6d, for which judgment was given for plaintiff ; costs, £1 9s 6d. S. VICKERS V. J. NASH. Claim, £3 6a. Mr Thome for plaintiff. « This was a claim for rent, which defendant denied. He took the house at 9s. a week, and plaintiff charged him 11s, which did not meet his views. Mr Samuel Vickers .proved that defendant occupied a house belonging to him in Edwardes-Btreet, and .that the rent agreed upon was 11s a-week; he then turned over the house to another tenant who had also paid the same amount of rent.

James Nash deposed that he took the house for 9s, on the understanding that he was to keep it dark from the other tenants. Judgment for plaintiff; costs £1 4s 6d.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18750709.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1682, 9 July 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
378

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.— THIS DAY. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1682, 9 July 1875, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.— THIS DAY. Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1682, 9 July 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert