Sjiatvly Lord Raglan G-old Mining Compant.—This case was heard last Courtday. Mr. Beveridge now applied for a rehearing on behalf of the company, agninst which the Court gave judgment when the case was heard.—Mr. Heskith opposed the granting ot t,h-3 rehearing*—The Court said it would give itsdecision before the Court rose. Neil v. McKenzie.—Mr. James Russell for the plaintiff, Mr. Ree3 for the defendant. —This was a claim for £47, balance of an account for a quantity of timber. There were a number of disputed items in the account, wholly one of figures, and without the slightest public interest. A number of witnesses were called on both side 3.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18710327.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Auckland Star, Issue 378, 27 March 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
109Untitled Auckland Star, Issue 378, 27 March 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in