RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Feidat. [Before Thomas Beckbam, Esq., 8,/ M.]
Judgment foe Piaintiffs.—Wm, Brown v. Kobert B. Middleton, £312s ; Sarah White r. John Sutcliffe, £2 14s, use and occupation; Auckland Consolidated Gold Mining Company v. W. Knoops, calls; Archard and Brown v. Bobert Brown, claim £3 6s. Defendants consented to take £6 9s, for which sum the judgment of the Court passed ; Auckland Consolidated Gold Mining Companj v. Hugh Campbell, £11 15b ; same v. John , Metcalf, £6 5s ; same v. J. Armstead,£l lft | 6d j John Carey v. John McCarthy, board and lodging £1; W. J. Vance and Co. y.j Edward Hogan, £10 17s 6d. : Cases Adjoubned.—Tapu Great Republic Gold Mining Company v. Patrick McMilby, £7 4s. ~ , :; ; Nonsuit. —Mirchell, Boker, and Co. v. J. ! A. Pond, £12. DEFENDED CASES. HENET W. MITCHMi T. J. AND J. DICKT, —Claim £15, for the non-delivery of certain goods by the defendants. —Mr. Russell for th« plaintiff, Mr. Wynn for the defendants.—After hearing evidence, a nonsuit was recorded. • Joseph Beat v. John Bbay.—Claim £iO, for trespass. —Messrs. Russell and Sheehan for the plaintiff, Mr. Wynn for the defence.— After some discussion, the case was settled.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18701104.2.12
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 257, 4 November 1870, Page 2
Word Count
191RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 257, 4 November 1870, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in