Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Friday.

[Before Thomas Beckham, Esq., R.M.]

Judgments for Plaintiffs.—John C. Morrin v. Alan Bailiie, £3 2s. lOd.; William Brown v. Angus Mclsaacs, £5 3s. ; Superintendent v. P. Nolan, 18s.; same v. William DaYies, £2 3s. 9d.; same v. Star of the South Gold Mining Company, £11 lls. 6d. ; same v. Graham, £5 Bs. ; same v. George Bull, £6 ss. ; same v. Prince of Wales Gold Mining Company, 10s. 6d.; same v. Southern Cross Gold Mining Company, £1 16s. 6d.; same v. Queen of the East, 16s. (All the above were for work done on the Thames tramway.) Anderson v. Garliok & Brissenden, £13 19s. 2d.; Sydney Griffiths v. Daniel Sellars, £2 15s. ; Jackson & Russell v. C. R. Walker, £17 ; Superintendent v. Dixon's Gold Mining Company, ss. : same v. Ballarat S ar G 'id Mining Company, £6 ; same v. Lord Raglan Gold Mining Company, £1 65.; C. Rayner v. I'lios. Abram, £i 3s. lid; Dalton v. F. Somers, £7 9s. sd, amount of unsatisfied judgment (order miide for the »mount to be pud at the rate of 15s. per week) ; g. & J. R. Vaiie v. J. O. McLead, £10 18s. 7d.

CASiS Adjoubneli.—Trustees of S. M. GTreen v. G-. I. Ki^etly, £20 ; Sarah White v. Jolin Sutcliff, £i 14s ; Edward JNolan v. Dellepiene, £10 10s., money paid. Noxsttit Becokded. —William Brown v. O. A. Rayon, £4 16s, for advertising in the Daily Southern Grots. Defended Oases.—Auckland Consolidated Company v. E. Briggs : Claim, 12a. 6d., Liquidator's calls. Mr. Slieehan for the plaintiff. After heaving the evidence, judgment was given for the plaintiff.—Frederick Shultz v.

James Knight, £4, wages. After baring evidence, the Court ordered a nonsuit to be recorded. —Samuel Partridge v. T. B. Hannaford : _Claiin 3 £1 14s. Bd. Judgment for plaintiff.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18701028.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 251, 28 October 1870, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
293

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Friday. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 251, 28 October 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Friday. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 251, 28 October 1870, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert