RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT FRIDAY.

Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 203, 2 September 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT FRIDAY.

[Before Thomas Beckham, Esq., R.M.] Judgments fob Plaintiffs.

North Island G. M. Co. v. C. Burton, claim £5, for calls ; Trustees of Meyers v. Rust, £7 Us lid, goods ; North Island G. M. Co. v. Mahoney, £2 10s, calls ; George Grledhill v. George Close, Cl Gs 3d, balance of account ; E. George & Co. v. H. Berge, £2 0s Id, goods ; Brown v. Wm. Rose, £1 17s. Gd. account; Same v. 11. Rawlings, £1. 17s. 6d.; Same v. George Spiuks, £2 Is. 6d.; Same r. Wm. McQuillan, £1 10s. ; Same v. Wm. Walters. £1 10s. 7d.; Red Queen G.M.C. v. J. Bram!ey, £L Bs., calls ; Sam* v. D. McMillan, £2 2s. 9cl. ; J. Brock v. D. May, £4 155., for work and labour ; Win. Miller v. John Bishop, £8, 1.0. U. ; H. Daffey v. Mary Atkinson, £7 Gs. 5d., unsatisfied judgment ; ordered to pay 15s. per month ; Auckland Consolidated G. M. C. v. Joseph Buckley, £10 Is. od., unsatisfied judgment, La this last case the defendant neglected to attend, although it was' proved that his travelling expenses had been sent to him at the Thames. 'J he Court ordered a warrant to be issued Hales v. A. Baird, £11 Bs. 6d.; F. G. Clayton v. W. J. Messenger, £1 ss. 6d.

Jxtdgmint Confessed. William Adam v. Edward Discen, 63 and costs.

Adjourned. Mitchell, Baker & Co, v. Martin Sholl, £20 work, &c.

Defended Cases. band of hope v. p.. b. Hitchcock, Claim £1 for calls.

Mr. H. H. Lusk for the plaintiff. Mr. Kees for the defendant.

The defence was that defendant was not a shareholder. Judgment reserved.

(Left sitting.)