DISTRICT COURT.—Monday, i 1 (Before his Honor Judge Beckham.) Judgments foe Plaintiffs. Read v. Baker.—Claim, £79 ; amount of certain dishonoured cheques, with interest. Benstead v. Hill.—Claim, £43 ; monej g had. Cohen v. Eicke. - Claim, £2512s 6d ; money lent, and interest. ■ Richards v. Auckland Consolidated Gold m Mining Company. -Claim £6 9s ; goods sold and delivered. Hesketh v. Clement and others,—Claim £52 14s 2d ; for professional services. Kissling v. Bennett.—Claim, £47 6s ; for repairs and alterations made at the Symonds- j street Music Hall; and £4 4a>, costs of arbitration. Adjournments. Superintendent v. Johnson, —Until next Court day. - ■ Ashley Gold Mining Company v. J. B. Russell. —Until next Court day. Pride of Parnell G-old Mining Company v. Hales.—Until next Court day, to file a defence. Owen & Graham v. Yeale.—This cause was ordered to be placed on the bottom of the defeuded list. The Court would then determine what action was to be taken, as to adjournment or not. I APPLICATION FOR AN OKDER TO WIND UP A | GOLD MINING COMPANY. Mr. Weston applied for an order for the winding up of the Golden Gate Gold Mining Company, forthwith, at the suit of Fraser and Tinne, creditors in the sum of £231135. Due notice of intention to apply had been given 1 under the provisions of the Gold Mining I Companies Limited Liability Act, 1865, and I the Amended Act, 1869. DEFENDED OASES. Brunkard v. Lupton, damages. Mr. MacCormick for plaintiff; Mr. Richmond for defendant. A jun had been summoned to (ry this case, but owing to an amicable arrangement having been in ado between the legal advisers for their clients, the jury was dismissed, and the case was struck out. Three jurymen who were absent when called on the last Court day, gave various ex- i cuses for non-attendance. One of them wai fined 40s, and the other two were ordered to make affidavit of the reasons, which were held 1 by the Court to be satisfactory, in which case their fines would be remitted. A juror applied for payment for the two days he had been in attendance. His Honor said that he had no power to aiake any order for expenses where jurors had not been I sworn. [Left sitting.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18700328.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 68, 28 March 1870, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
371Untitled Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 68, 28 March 1870, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.