Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PINAFORE v. DREAM.

To the Editor. Sir,—Since the event—it can't be ? a Wfl a race—of the .18th instant, when the accident to the Pinafore's the Dream had a walk over the course, Toss will has been twice challenged i>y\ I word of mouth, and once l>y advertisement. \ I He lias declined ail threechalleng.es with- j-1 out reason assigned. In your last issue, } however, he offers to race provided he gets choice of weather, which is a confession that the Pinafore is a better all round boat. The Dream is larger and more heavily built, and therefore letter adapted £qj. heavy weather. In pitting Pinafrore against Dream? I aelf no concessions, toifc simply say that I am ready ait any tiinK o meet Mr ToseVill, provided he will a day not less than a week ahead, i.e.,J£O far ahead that the weather cannoee forecast. Eegarding Mr Tosewill's letrer, I must take exception to hia statement that " the two boats have really never met and sailed together yet." I have been under the impression that they met at the last two Regattas. That they " sailed together," however, one can't go on to say, inasmuch, as from start to finish in each case the Dream fell behind, and in both regattas came in half-at-mile aetajn. Speaking next of chance meetings bet\«n the two boats, Mr Tosswill says the DrSffn ' has on al! such occasions gone Allowing that such has been casejpt remains to be explained that f.ri% • Pinafore >, at such times has not been in racing trim, and as a rule baa merely been in charge of amateurs. Enough, however, of shelter behind amateurs, or confessions of*| having been out-general led in regard to Btanding too far into thi« or that bay. _ Let J the boats have it out, and this rests in Mr M Tosswill's hands. He allowed twelvee months to pass by after the Dream'e b<|flfl beaten in the Regatta of ' 81, and (■■ when lie did challenge the event fiasco. Hβ declined to accept three die-J tinct and separate challenges.—Yourl» etc., W.H.HBNNINGT "

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18821229.2.12.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 674, 29 December 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
341

PINAFORE v. DREAM. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 674, 29 December 1882, Page 2

PINAFORE v. DREAM. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 674, 29 December 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert