PINAFORE v. DREAM.
To the Editor. Sir,—Since the event—it can't be ? a Wfl a race—of the .18th instant, when the accident to the Pinafore's the Dream had a walk over the course, Toss will has been twice challenged i>y\ I word of mouth, and once l>y advertisement. \ I He lias declined ail threechalleng.es with- j-1 out reason assigned. In your last issue, } however, he offers to race provided he gets choice of weather, which is a confession that the Pinafore is a better all round boat. The Dream is larger and more heavily built, and therefore letter adapted £qj. heavy weather. In pitting Pinafrore against Dream? I aelf no concessions, toifc simply say that I am ready ait any tiinK o meet Mr ToseVill, provided he will a day not less than a week ahead, i.e.,J£O far ahead that the weather cannoee forecast. Eegarding Mr Tosewill's letrer, I must take exception to hia statement that " the two boats have really never met and sailed together yet." I have been under the impression that they met at the last two Regattas. That they " sailed together," however, one can't go on to say, inasmuch, as from start to finish in each case the Dream fell behind, and in both regattas came in half-at-mile aetajn. Speaking next of chance meetings bet\«n the two boats, Mr Tosswill says the DrSffn ' has on al! such occasions gone Allowing that such has been casejpt remains to be explained that f.ri% • Pinafore >, at such times has not been in racing trim, and as a rule baa merely been in charge of amateurs. Enough, however, of shelter behind amateurs, or confessions of*| having been out-general led in regard to Btanding too far into thi« or that bay. _ Let J the boats have it out, and this rests in Mr M Tosswill's hands. He allowed twelvee months to pass by after the Dream'e b<|flfl beaten in the Regatta of ' 81, and (■■ when lie did challenge the event fiasco. Hβ declined to accept three die-J tinct and separate challenges.—Yourl» etc., W.H.HBNNINGT "
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18821229.2.12.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 674, 29 December 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
341PINAFORE v. DREAM. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 674, 29 December 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.