AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Tuesday, Ootobuu 23
Bel-'oki-: Justin Ayui;m, Esq., 11. M.,
Hammond v. P. Shadbolt. Claim £G for share of boundary fence. It appeared from the evidence that the plain tilt" had some land next to that o2 defendants. Defendant, however, was not in occupation of the land which was leased when he bought it to a man named Prince. Prince while i. , occupation of the land had agreed to the fence being erected but he went through the Court after it was put up and by this Ilia lease was cancelled and the laud foil into Shadbolt's own possession. KhadboU refused to pay the share of the fencing on the ground t hat it \vs.s purely Prince's transaction, and ho found the fence on lha land when he took possession. The case was adjourned for a week.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18821027.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 656, 27 October 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
140AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 656, 27 October 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in