THE OBNOXIOUS BY-LAW.
At the same sitting of the R.M. Court, Mr Charles liaylock was fined five nhilHivijs for driving cuttle through tbe town during the prohibited hours. There is no doubt he, was legally liabl-, and that it, was riyd.it he should be lined, but when one comes to Uiink that it was impossible for him to get pnst the town by any other road, it seems hard indeed.
Why the Borough Council do not move in the matier is beyond us, but t-erhaps they uve waiting for the influcutially signed petition, which is now being circulated, to b;? brought before them, it is to \w hoped when they do get it thoy will act at once, for the
alteration or cancelling of a by-law is a long operation, and we hope that Mr Haylock will be the last person to suffer by this oppresive law.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18821003.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 649, 3 October 1882, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
147THE OBNOXIOUS BY-LAW. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 649, 3 October 1882, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in