Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Friday, September 22

Before Justin Ayuier, Esq., R M.. and

W. B. Tosswill, Esq., J.P.

ASSAULT,

Chiiles Bates was charged by Robert Jannony with assaulting him on the 20th inst., at French farm, by taking him by the coat and shaking him.

Kobt. Jurmony deposed that ho was working fur Mr Knight, mid on the day in question had gone on to land belonging to Bates to do some fencing between him and Mr Knight. Bates had warned him off, and then assaulted in the way described. It was not a severe assault, and he hid had warning from Mr Bates not to trespass on the paddock, as it was shut up lor grass seed.

Defendant stated he had shut up the paddock for grass seed in the middle of August, and had given due notice to his neighbors.

A. C. Knight deposed that he had given defendant due notion of his intention to fence in May last. As there was no way of taking the fencing m iteiial on his own land, he had, in accordance with the 36th clause of the Fencing Act, taken it across defendant's land : and now he was stopped with going on with the work because Bates hid shut up the land for grass seed, at what he (Mr Knight) considered an unusual time. Pie was most anxious to get the work done, as he lost heavily by the fence not being.up.

The Bench said that the latter part of the 36th clause stated that if any one shut up their land for crop due notice had to be given them, and their permission obtained before any one had the right to go on their land, and thtu take advantage of the first part of the clause. As Bates had not given his permission, and had clearly a right to shut up his land when he chose for a crop, Jarmony was a trespasser. They would therefore dismiss the case. REFUSING TO SUPPORT. Andrew Pietersen, whose two children are in the Burnham Industrial School, was summoned to show why he did not contribute towards their support. He was ordered to pay 10s a week for the present, and 5s a week when one of the children leaves the school, which will probably be in a few we.±kn, as some pooplo arc anxious to adopt her.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18820926.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 647, 26 September 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
395

AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 647, 26 September 1882, Page 2

AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 647, 26 September 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert