Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHRISTCHURCH R.M. COURT.

The following- case interesting- to Akaroa readers was heard at the R.M. Court, Christchurch, on Wednesday : —

Judge v. Callaglian. Claim £25 damages incurred *»y plaintiff through de;'endant converting to his own use a certain bullock, the property of phihtiff. Mr Joynt for plaintiff, Mr Button for defendant. The point at issue in the action was the ownership of the bullock in question. It appeared from the evidence that on Oct. 4, 1681. an auction sale was held at Tai Tapu by Messrs Matson & Co. On the night previous a number of plaintiff's and do fondant's cattle were yar:!ed together in the same paddock. Plaintiff said he had 30 head of cattle there, and defendant Imi toid him the night previous that his number was 87. At the sale plaintiff found one of his cattle, which he described as a white steer, branded « T in circle on near rump, and notched on tho tip of right ear, missing. He subsequently ascertained, he said, that this beast had been sold on defendant's account to a Mr Grant, and in January last he saw it on a farm at Ashburton, and identified it. The expenses incurred by plaintiff and the value of the beast (£4 10s) amounted to £2i 7s 4-d. The brand mentioned was plaintiff's registered brand, but two witnesses for plaintiff said that the brand mark on the beast in question was very indistinct, having been placed partially above another brand. Defendant admitted that he had been under the impression that 87 was the number of his cattle, but he subsequently ascertained that he had one more. He said he had bought tho bullock in dispute from Mr Lelievre, at Akaroa. He had not noticed the brand or ear mark. He had seen tho beast on Tuesday, and was certain tti.ic it was the one ho had purchased from Lelievre. Breitmeyer said he had reared tho beast, and branded it I with J in circle on the left rump ; he had marked him with a V on the right ear. This beast pussed from witness to Mr

Lelievre, who had sold him to Mr Callaghan. He had no doubt that the beast in question was the one lie referred to. Anguste Lelievre said he had seen the beaat in question, and was certain that it was the one he had sold to Callaghan. J. A. Shrimpton said that when the cattle were counted at Uubinson's Bay, from which defendant started for Tai Tapu, there were 88. Mr Lelievre counted them. On the application of Mr Joynt, an adjournment of the case to Tuesday next was agreed upon, in order to secure the attendance of a material witness.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18820421.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VI, Issue 602, 21 April 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
449

CHRISTCHURCH R.M. COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VI, Issue 602, 21 April 1882, Page 2

CHRISTCHURCH R.M. COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume VI, Issue 602, 21 April 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert