AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 4, Issue 402, 11 June 1880, Page 2

AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

:: : ■ Tuesday; JutfE 8.- '• ■ (Before r «T; -Aylmer,. ESq., R.M ! .)' ; Civil Cases. *. v \ WIGGINS AND. CO. V. E. HAINEB. The plaintiffs in. this case sued defendant for the amount bf £2 IOsV ' Judgment wits-given by default for amount claimed and costs; ; .. WES. CHAMBERLAIN V. W. STRACHAN. . In this case the plaintiiE sued defendant for the sum of £2'.|is. . ..^ .,-•„. ~•/ There'was no appearance of the defendant. The plaintiff that the'claim was, for cashietit to issue a flu'nainoris against a debtor; that the' defendant : had received his money, but had never been man enough to call and repay the loan ; that when he had been applied, to i-for ith.e had told the plaintiff to go to h—l. The plaintiff stated that upon that reply he had immediately, proceeded, to the B. M. Court. ''\" !.": Mr Naider\tr&ted r .l:he plaintiff; intended ho reflection on theCourfera ' • - Judgment was given for amount claimed and costs. ,; ■;■ ■■. /;_■: ■'■:<. :: ;. ■ : - T.S. JOHNSON V. PETER DAVID. CI aim, £6. Mr Nalder appeared for defendant, who pleaded " not indebted." The plaintiff stated that the amount was due-for labor.which he had rendered at a job taken bn'.contfac|.by"T. Brough and Peter David as'partners. He called upon - John Barwickto prove'the partnership. Witness,; before.tendering evidence, claimed his'coßts", which the plaintiff consented topay. , He then\produced certain papers, which,, the Bench considered sufficient evidence to the fact. ; ..,, Mr Najde'ri stated in defence that plaintifl' h ! adl [.already ,sued Brbiigh, and got judgment, and he contended that'as Johnson had elected to sue the one partner and ;.had, got JTudgtnent-he must-abide by -his choice. He could not, because that partnerihadjjfailed r -fall back upon the-other one. i '■' ■ *fc% ■•■■ The Bench adjourned the Mse till Friday, June 11. ; The Cojuit then adjourned. ; .