AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Tuesday, Sept. 30. (Before Justin Aylmer, Esq., R.M., and R. Westenra, Esq., J.P.) CIVIL CASES.
Jolly and Slater v. the Akaroa Borough Council. —Claim, £22 Bs. This action was brought to recover amount due for the formation of footpaths in Upper Jollie street. The defence was that the work had not been done according to specification. It turned out, however, that there was no specification which was binding on the contractors, the work having been arranged for verbally. Judgment for plaintiffs for amount claimed and costs.
Sullivan v. Kenny.—Claim, £19 3s sd, for wages. Judgment for defendant for amount claimed and costs.
J. Sunckell, jun. v. Curtis.—Claim, £7 0s %\d, for meat.supplied. Judgment by consent for amount claimed and costs.
Same v. Same.—Claim, £44 Bs, for rent. Defendant claimed the value of some fencing as a set-off. Adjourned till October 3.
The Court then adjourned
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18791003.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 4, Issue 335, 3 October 1879, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
149AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 4, Issue 335, 3 October 1879, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in