AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Friday, Sept.. 19.... .. , I '"'' (Before Justin Aylmer, Esq., R.__}.) ::; ; civil cases. f "■•'• T. Brook v. —• Atherton—Mr Nalder appeared for the defendant. '" This'was a claim of £10 for board. No appearance of plaintifE. Judgment for amount paid into court, £5 10s. G. Stephens v. J. Beecher—This was a claim for travelling expenses from Timaru, amounting;to £3 14s, when'plaintiff came todeferidant's employ. Mr Stephens stated that he came dowri here as servant for; Mr Beecher and considered that i Mr .Beecher should- pay his travelling.expenses one way. It was the general custom; for em-; ployers to do so. Mr Beecher stated that if, a servant remained with him for-sis. rnopfhs he would pay their travelling expenses: One. way, but as plaintiff had only* sta3*ed three months and three weeks with him he did not consider he should "pay it, Mr A. Rodrigues called, stated that when .he engaged servants he always paid their \ travelling expenses one way. Judgment for for defendant. The Court then adjourned:
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18790923.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 4, Issue 332, 23 September 1879, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
167AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 4, Issue 332, 23 September 1879, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in