AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Tuesday, Oct. 8. (Before Justin Aylmer, Esq., R.M.) ,_,.-■; i .'-/ I CATTLE TRESPASS.\ ~, , . H. T. Worsley, for allowing five cows to wander in a public thoroughfare, was, in his absence, fined 10s and costs. Civil Cases. Prince v. Libeau.—This was a case in which judgment was reserved from the previous Court, day. Hi.s Worship, in giving judgment, said that the defendant had, by various, acts of his own, really taken over the buildings from the contractor. The, key of> one was in lire possession; ho had painted both and cobbed one, also- -built brick piles under them. Every act' of Libeau's showed he had taken possession.. sand' if the cjottages were not completed in terms of the specifications,! he should hot have done so until they were. Judgment would be for the plaintiff for the. amount;claimed with costs. . i ( . Amiand v. 'Greening , . , —A- c'laihi'for'tho sum of £1 10-v goods supplied. Judgment by default for amount claimed, with costs. ■ ! The Court then adj6ufned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18781011.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 3, Issue 233, 11 October 1878, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
165AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume 3, Issue 233, 11 October 1878, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in