Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A CONCLUSION WITHOUT PREMISES

(TO'THE EDITOR OF THE AKAROA MAIL.) Slß,—Without desiring to stir up troubled waters unnecessarily, there is a feature in the late painful trial for perjury to which in common justice to myself I feel bound to call the attention of your readers. In answer to questions as to the reason for the decision sriven by the Bench in the civil case • Watkins v. Adams,' Mr. Aylmer

R.M., stated as follows:—" Our chief ' reason was that the goods had been, sup- ' plied clandestinely to Mrs. Adams., She " nad a private engagement with the jtore- " keeper unknown to Mr. Adams, ■J'sSsi''gi " private bill was kept." Nqwj Sir, my 'books were produced ;in Court, and must 'have shown distinctly that this statement is incorrect. Moreover, Mr. Williams, the defendant's counsel, states in answor to Mr. Duncan : —" There was no separate " account in the" plaintiff's book. There " was a memorandum in the margin show- " ing what account should be sent to Mr. " Adams, and what to Mrs. Adams." With regard to the latter part of this statement, I may bo allowed to say that Mrs. Adams name does not appear in any shape or form in my book at all, either in. the margin or otherwise. All that I did was, what any storekeeper would do, if requested by a storekeeper to do. so, viz., to render two accounts (both to Mr. Adams mark,) one pontaining items;of grocery, and the other drapery," &o. lifiave carried on business in this place about twenty years, and I hope I may say that my cha- ' racterfor upright'and fair dealing, is too well established to be materially injured by any aspersions cast upon it. I have thought it but right to ajak for a portion of your space to vindicate myself. I may state .that I have shewn xny beoks to a professional accountant, who assures me that there is nothing in the slightest degree irregular or unusual in the way the account in question was kept.—l am,, &c., H. G-. WATKINS.-^. /

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18770710.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume I, Issue 102, 10 July 1877, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

A CONCLUSION WITHOUT PREMISES Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume I, Issue 102, 10 July 1877, Page 2

A CONCLUSION WITHOUT PREMISES Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume I, Issue 102, 10 July 1877, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert