CIVIL SERVICE RETRENCHMENT
The reductions m salaries throughout the EBtlmatea seem to ub far too sweeping to be either discriminative or well considered. The principle on * which the reductions are made apparently very much reeemblos the Donnybrook Injunction, •' Wherever you sea a head hit it," Ministers have hit all round, regardless of length of eorvlce, qcalificalicns, speolal dutla», or anything else, m fact\ The reductions are, m man,y c.ages, dreadfully severe, and it (a ha,rd on the Civil Service all roand that, m addition to having to. bear the increased taxation oommoD to all classes of the community, they should be subjected to aspeolalinoome tax of a remarkably heavy character. In many oases where the present Bilaries have been attained after a lifetime spent m the public service, it is especially hard that m their old age, when early retirement will m thecourae of nature beccme imperative, officers ehould find thglr oalartas, the amount on vrhjch $b,elc retiring 'pension ia ooniputed, re'c|qoed. Jt is, not the mere loss of salary that they sufler, hut reduQUoo m \hv permanent provision fo.r old age whloh they have gpent a lifetime m earning, and supposed they had secured. If it be necessary that the reduction* lo salary should be made on aooonnt of t'io exigencies of the State daring the present period of depression, the Government ought, we think, to introduce a short Bill providing that tha redactions which are necessary, aa bopQ, only temporarily, shall npt bp taken into account m theooraputatlon of pensions to those who retire. The pensions should be calculated as if the previous three yeara' service was atlll at the old rate. Wa think the older offioera J are at least entitled to this recognition i of what may almost be regarded, as a vested interae^, The Uat oj| "reductions, as hafe said, Bnows a want of proper diacrlmiuktlon, The rednotton of £15.0 a year id the salary of the SurveyorGeneral la one instance. There is no man m the public service of h'gher scientific attainments, or who bos done greater lorvlce to the colonji His salary (£900) has never been an excasslve one for the position he oooupies and th.a gegpenalbllltiea h,e Ij burdene4 wUh'J Hhife'the redqe.tio^ of '£16(0 a year la undoubtedly excessive, and. its anfairneas ia. brought out by Qompitrlaou with the case of Mr Maxwell, who, as General IVlanncror of Railways, retains his salary of £1000 a year unreduced. Between the scientific attainments and public uaefu'naae of the tyro gentlemen there can be no o mpariaon. There aie many other anomalies and injustices la the estimates bafpre us, but it It, we svsppoa^, uNelosa \o point them oat— -a^ least With 1 any expootMtoa of thole being ramedlecl,— " Bo«t,"
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18880614.2.24
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1867, 14 June 1888, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
455CIVIL SERVICE RETRENCHMENT Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1867, 14 June 1888, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.