Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CRAWFORD CASE.

Further Evidence.

[KETJTEB’S TELEGRAMS —COPYRIGHT.]

London, July 19

The divorce suit, Crawford v. Crawford and Dilke, is still proceeding. The evidence of experts showed the handwriting of the several annonyraous letters received by Mr Crawford to be similar to that of the respondent, Mrs Crawford. Mrs Rogerson testified to having received a confession of adultery from Sir Chas. Dilke. London, Jnly 20. In the Crawford-Dilke divorce suit Mrs Crawford testified she was seduced by Sir Charles Dilke and detailed her adulteries with the co-respondent and Captain Forster,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18860721.2.23

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1294, 21 July 1886, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
90

THE CRAWFORD CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1294, 21 July 1886, Page 3

THE CRAWFORD CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1294, 21 July 1886, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert