THE PETREL CASE.
Ar;cKL\ND July 17, At the c ! ose rf the evidence in the Pot. r ei case :o-'t-y Mr C >*t>;r e'a'ed that t .iat w,:s ! he. ft 1,-la "f the evidence for the defence lie submitted that 'here was rut % prima facie case of wilful killing against ti.o capia u, and in supp rt of hla contention he drew attention to an extract from “ Clarke on Extradition,” page 109, which ia learned friend Mr Campbell had previously qu ted. Tr.ia authority showed that a prima facie case of wilful killing must be made before an t xiradition warrant could be gramed, The reason why he had put in “ Clarke on Extradition ” ’was that the’ information' and Governor’s warrant both charged the prisoners with killing Cooper. Mr O’ Meagher merely affirmed as Mr Cotter had d- no, that a prima facie case had not been made out against the pciseners. His Worship said “ Edwin Jas. Reid and Charles Henry Foley,—Some acts of illtreatment against this man Cooper have undoubtedly been proved against you ; that is admitted by your own witness. If I thought there was any evidence to show that these acta had even In a most remote degree contributed to Cooper’s death I would have no hesitation whatever in cotnmi ting yon to surrender to the authorities of your own country, but I have come to the conclusion that there ia no evidence to show that any of there acta against accused conduced to the death of Cooper. In other words a prima facie case h?a not been made out. Therefore you are discharged. Both thee-plain and mate then left the
coutt, and were followed by a large concourse of people who had thronged the court. The captain accompanied hfs solicitor, Mr Coper, to that gentleman’s office, in Scotland street:, while Foley, the first mate, proceeded to the police station along with Mendez*, the second mate, to reenme possession of his property. In the guard house he threw up his arms in a transport of pleasure, and exclaimed, “ Free again ! Halleljah ! Glory to God ! as the Saiv ».tion people say.” Ha then entered into a brisk convention with those around him, and received their congratulations whh 'evident satisfaction. On arriving in the United Stales Reid, Foley, and Manhozt will make a formal demand to Government for payment of the expenses entitlei upon them in New Zealand by legal proceedings undertaken against them at t le instance of the actingOoosul.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18860719.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1292, 19 July 1886, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
412THE PETREL CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1292, 19 July 1886, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.