COURT OF APPEAL.
[bt tblkoeawe.] ' Wellington, To-d*y. In the Appeal Court, to-day aoveral judgment* were given. In MoLaran v. Walker the appeal was dumlieed with costa; in W. Booth v. Ragle the appeal was dismissed with costs ; in Regiea r. Birch the conviction ia .the Court below was quashed. In Wilberfoss v. Try Again Qold Mining Company, their Honors in delivering judgment agreed with the Judge in the Court below, that all turned on the question whether the forfeiture of shares under the 64th section of the Mining Companies Act, 1874, was or was not optional with the Company, and the question whether the language of the Statute was not to be construed literally. The Court below held that the appellant was not liable to calls made after forfeiture had taken place# Judgment would be for the appellant with costs in this Court and the Court below.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18840531.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1268, 31 May 1884, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
147COURT OF APPEAL. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1268, 31 May 1884, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in