A DIVORCE CASE.
[by telegraph.] •' ■ f j'l CHRISTCHURCH, To-day.
At the Supreme Coart lofdty 2the divorce case ofP. PoppleWellY.-iPop. plewell and Clifford Was ■ Hiard. The petitioner and respondent were 5 iharried in 1878 at Amuri, and lived together till August 28th last, on the Culverdpte station. The petitioner’s tiji station took him away from? hotnea great deal, and the was working as a carpenter ihihe diatrict, taking advantage of it, intimate with the, ' respondent?! petitioner’s suspicions, hayicjg il'tbgqa aroiised, he pretended'oh to go away 'to work,‘butt after dark and caught tbe^. l ott respondent and respondent in together. He seized a shovel-handle and attacked the co-respondent, but got the worst of the struggle. Next day the respondent left the house, and subsequently, lived for a month with' co-respondent in a tent in an adjoining swamp. His Honor granted a rule nisi, the co-respondent to pay costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18830131.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 856, 31 January 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
146A DIVORCE CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 856, 31 January 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in