PERTINENT QUESTION.
A young man in a neighbouring county seat was fined for intoxication, and the tine was remitted on condition that he stay sober until July 4. Is it far to a man who has acquired the drink appetite to put saloons in his way and then demand that he stay sober i Every time he sees a saloon or smells the odor that comes from one he has an uncontrollable desire to go in and till up. Is it fair to set traps to create the desire, inflame it to the point of desperation, and when he falls, to punish him for it? Is it not true that if you vote for saloons you are to blame for the shame and misery they unload on the community? Uhrie hsville Chronicle.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/WHIRIB19161018.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
White Ribbon, Volume 22, Issue 256, 18 October 1916, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
132PERTINENT QUESTION. White Ribbon, Volume 22, Issue 256, 18 October 1916, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Women's Christian Temperance Union New Zealand is the copyright owner for White Ribbon. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this journal for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. This journal is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Women's Christian Temperance Union New Zealand. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this journal, please refer to the Copyright guide
Log in