Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Murihiku Trust in trouble?

TE TURE/The Law

“To the best of my knowledge no such ambitions and far reaching application has ever been made to the Maori Land Court” is how Judge M C Smith described the application of the Ngaitahu Maori Trust Board to establish a trust to manage 418 Maori land blocks of the Southland and West Otago areas on behalf of the numerous South Island owners of Ngaitahu and Ngati Mamoe.

The application followed months of intensive study and consultations under conduct of the Ngaitahu Maori Trust Board seeking ways to overcome the problem of fragmentation of land ownership and land holdings and to provide a vehicle to promote the economic growth and development of the people.

In October 1980 the Board produced a brochure entitled “Murihiku choices for the land choices for the people,” prior to convening several well attended meetings of owners at Bluff, Dunedin, Christchurch, Wellington, Te Hauke and Hamilton at a cost of many thousands of dollars.

But the application was dismissed in a decision of the Maori Land Court given on May 29.

SPECIAL LEGISLATION NEEDED

In dismissing the application, Judge Smith noted that there was a large measure of support for some form of corporate management but added; “I am absolutely convinced that special legislation is necessary to achieve the Board’s objectives ...” He then proceeded to draft a bill to provide for the establishment of Murihiku Incorporation to apply to those lands in the application that he considered ought to be included in it.

Judge Smith was critical of the form of draft order “in line in North Island districts.

“The various provisions in the draft order (filed by the Board) which purport to authorise trustees to spend monies to develop communal facilities; to promote tribal and cultural development; to pay monies into a putea account; to assist selected persons to establish businesses or buy homes, or to make general welfare payments, or which purport to empower a majority

shareholding at meetings of beneficial owners to decide the disposition of monies belonging to the minority, are all in breach of basic principles of trustee law and ultra vires the trustees or meetings as the case may be. “There is no doubt that many of these proposed powers are commendable, but special legislation would be necessary to authorise these” he said. DECISION RAISES ISSUES The Maori Land Court decision raises important issues for the Murihiku owners in particular and for Maori people in general, and in both cases, the views seem to have

been put squarely before the legislators. Will special legislation be proposed to enable the option for development chosen by a large sector of the Murihiku owners to become a reality? Will the Maori Affairs Act be amended to overcome many of the difficulties seen by the Court as affecting certain existing Section 438 trusts in the North Island? The answer to the first question may largely lie with the Minister of Maori Affairs and the Ngaitahu Trust Board but the answer to the second may also lie with the legislative review committee of the New Zealand Maori Council.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TUTANG19811001.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tu Tangata, Issue 2, 1 October 1981, Page 29

Word count
Tapeke kupu
519

Murihiku Trust in trouble? Tu Tangata, Issue 2, 1 October 1981, Page 29

Murihiku Trust in trouble? Tu Tangata, Issue 2, 1 October 1981, Page 29

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert