Rights of Anonymity in Correspondence
To the Editor Sir,-Recently two correspondents to your columns have taken to task thos2 whom they allege to be anonymous writers, claiming that they insult reacers by not disclosing their names Obviously, these two seek publicity. and naturally, to gain this, they must see their names in print. As a writer who from time to time has had his views published (anonymously, horvible thought!!), may I state that T have intentionally not revealed my uame, as I seek no publicity, having no desire to strut around, pu ’ out my" chest. and have a gaping multitude point me out as the author of certain articles. That these two writers boldly append their names means absolutely nothing to me, for I am none the wiser. They must expect criticism whether their names are published or not.-I am, ete.,
BE MODERN
Te Awamutu.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/RADREC19350201.2.9.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Radio Record, Volume VIII, Issue 30, 1 February 1935, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145Rights of Anonymity in Correspondence Radio Record, Volume VIII, Issue 30, 1 February 1935, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.
Log in