Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Strange as it May Seem

by

Victor S.

Lloyd

r I SUPPOSE most of you occasionally come across facts about people and places and things which strike you as being, shall I say, curious. And you say to yourself: "Well, now, that’s a peculiar thing!" I

know Ido. Anything out of the ordinary has a very strong fascination for me, and for some time now I have been collecting little bits from here and there which strike me as being unusual. Possibly they may be of interest to you. Here are a few of them. For instance, I was very surprised to learn that whistling is something that is simply not done by the Arabs. Some of us sing in our baths-I suppose it is the only place where people can’t stop us, and that’s why we do it-and some of us whistle. But the Arabs consider whistling the most unlucky sound that can be made by human lips. There is an old Arabic proverb to the effect that after whistling the mouth is not purified for forty days.

Aiter learning this about the Arabs, | made a tew inquiries and found that there were other people who disliked whistling. In the Tonga Islands, for instance, whistling is quite "tabu," and the people who liye in Iceland strongly object to it; they believe it to be a violation of the Divine Law. Whistling is quite unknown too among the descendants of the Peruvian Incas. A Cornishman ‘told me the other day that the miners in Cornwall]

are very superstitious about whistling, and they will not permit it whilst they are underground. The old hands think it a fertile source of evil, and the young hands are soon brought to think the same after they have been clouted once or twice by their elders. FRIEND of mine once told me that kissing used to be prohibited on a Sunday once upon a time. I was a little incredulous. Of course I didn’t tell him he was a-er-that I doubted his word-he is

larger than I am-but I looked up some old laws "hd found that my friend was quite right. Kissing was once prohibited on a Sunday. And not in Arabia, either. In England, and Scotland. and the American Colonies. The laws for the observance of the Lord’s Day were almost ferocious in their strictness during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth

Centuries It was a punishable offence in Scotland to walk farther on a Sunday than was necessary for a man to get from his own house to church, and it was even legal for houses to be searched during’ the service hours so that absentees might be brought out

and punished. And a man was not only prohibited from kissing his wife, but even his children on- the Sabbath. The most absurd restrictions were once placed on personal liberty. A certain Captain Kemble, for instance, who had been away at sea for three years, was actually put in the stocks for twenty-four hours on the day he arrived home. IS offence was described as ‘lewd and unseemly behaviour for that he did publickly kiss his wife on the doorstep of his house on the Sabbath Day. In a book called "Introduction to the History of Civilisation," by a gentleman named Buckle, you will, if you care to look them up, find

many instances of a similar nature. Less than fifty years ago, twenty men,were arrested in the village of Winstead, Connecticut, for having their dinners cooked on Sunday, and thirteen more for kissing their wives. Laws are peculiar things, aren’t they? Particularly when they are dealing with the relations between men and women. For instance, eloping couples to-day incut no more than their narents’ disanpproval-or their thanks-

according to the kind of children they are. But in some countries elopement is punishable by death. This law holds good in all Mohammedan countries in theory, and is actually carried into practice in some of them-Morocco for one-where civilised usages have not caused the ancient law to fall into desuetude In Turkey, some years ago, when a daughter of the Sultan was reported to have escaped with a boy friend, it was stated that she dared not return within her father’s jurisdiction as the death penalty would most certainly have been enforced had she done so.

In China, where parents have the power ot life. and death over their children, the law would sanction similar punishment, if the eloping couple did not have the sanction of their parents. At least this was true of China before the war. It may be altered now. I don’t know. Even in England, elopement was punishable by death up to the thirteenth century. We've progressed a bit since then, haven’t we? Fathers nowadays are only too

anxious to get their daughters married, or so it se¢ms.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/RADREC19320304.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Radio Record, Volume V, Issue 34, 4 March 1932, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
808

Strange as it May Seem Radio Record, Volume V, Issue 34, 4 March 1932, Page 7

Strange as it May Seem Radio Record, Volume V, Issue 34, 4 March 1932, Page 7

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert