Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROGRAMME DETAIL

Sir,-In common with other readers of your esteemed journal, I have often wondered why so much of your programme space-is wasted every week in superfluous information about musical items. Week after week we read, for example, that performances are scheduled of Beethoven’s Violin Concerto, in D major, Op. 61; Grieg’s Piano Concerto in A minor, Op. 16; Beethoven’s Sonata Appassionata in F minor, Op. 57; and similarly excessive references to the Violin Concertos of Brahms, Mendelssohn, Tchaikovski, and Schumann’s Piano Concerto, etc., etc. Every musician knows that Beethoven, Tchaikovski, Mendelssohn, and Brahms wrote only one violin concerto each; Grieg and Schumann only a single piano concerto. Therefore, why is it deemed necessary to add these redundant details about keys and "ops"? Musical readers are usually aware of them, while the general run of readers neither knows nor cares whether a particular piece is in latchkey or Lambton Quay, and probably, is much more interested in the productof hops than of "ops." What your readers really do wish to learn, in connection with such advertised items. is the name of the performer. Let me suggest an amended announce-

ment such as this, for instance: Beet‘hoven’s Violin Concerto (Heifetz); or Grieg’s Piano Concerto (Eileen Joyce). With due respect, I think this would be an improvement on your present system.

L. D.

AUSTIN

(Wellington).

(Mr Austin will find that these details are commonly given‘in printed programmes. They are given, for example, in the Radio Times, even when the reference is to the Third Programme. But he will also find that, though not wholly excluded, they now figure . much less frequently in broadcast announcements, the assumption being that those listeners who for any reason want them have looked or can look in The Listener. And in The Listener ‘it is simpler and safer to follow the convention without exceptions than to make exceptions, say, of the unique works of any kind in a composer’s catalogue.-Ed.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19581128.2.18.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 39, Issue 1006, 28 November 1958, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
323

PROGRAMME DETAIL New Zealand Listener, Volume 39, Issue 1006, 28 November 1958, Page 11

PROGRAMME DETAIL New Zealand Listener, Volume 39, Issue 1006, 28 November 1958, Page 11

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert