Tales of the Long Bow
bw
SUNDOWNER
FEBRUARY 22
HEN I was young a rabbit shot at 50 yards was 150 yatds away when I got home; a stag brought down at 200 yards moved off to 500, and a running pis stopped at any distance at all over 5 yards was 300 yards away when I hit it, or more. It was not lying and nothing else, but it was lying more than anything else-conscious in accuracy lit
up and stimulated by vanity, swagger, and the excitement of the
chase. Today all my distances have shrunk to the dim realities of age and a rabbit at 100 yards is safe from everything but a fluke. But I need not have worried about my early lies. They were timid, dull and small, I have this week read a book by an American correspondent who was in the field with the Boers in 1900, and it was nothing for Boer marksmen to kill running hares at 500 yards. A stationary hare 500 yards is position and very little magnitude; a running hare is a@ moving blur. But the Boers did better than that. While they were filling in time waiting for Lord Roberts to advance from Bloemfontein, "Commandant Blignaut, of the Transvaal, killed three running springbok at a range of more than 1700 yards, a feat witnessed by a score of persons." I think I have met these "witnesses" before and these reporters. A springbok at 1700 yards is a hare'at 1000 yards-with this difference, that it runs like a rooster robbed suddenly of its head, up and down without ceasing, but so fast that at 1700 yards you might as well shoot at the Morse code. A feat witnessed by a score of persons can be a bladder blown up by 20 unreasoning fools. Brayely as the Boers fought, and skilfully, they lost —
their war. They lost because they were outnumbered at least six, and perhaps ten, to one. But ten men who can’t hit a horse at 200 yards are all dead before they reach the concealed marksman who can bowl over running springbok at 1700 yards. Only one in six of the men who fought against the Boers did not return, after three years of battles, accidents, and intermittent waves of disease. When a man tells me that two and two are five, I think his arithmetic is weak, When he says they are 25 I write a note about him. * x x
FEBRUARY 25
HE day after I wrote a note about the arrival of wasps in the South Island, Jim brought me one impaled on a cork. He had caught it in his kitchen, and’ since then has caught and seen others. Though I have so far seen none myself, I can’t suppose that they have passed me by. But when I suggésted to Jim that wasps may help to keep the flies down
and at the same time fertilise his lucerne, he said that if thev
did one of these things they would not do the other-that they could not be honey-eaters and also carnivorous. That sounded right to me, good logic and good biology; yet I was sure that I had read that wasps do have these contradictory habits, Though it was the blind trying to lead the blind I made another search through my books and found more than one plain statement by authorities that while mature wasps like ase --
honey, and in late summer live largely on the sweet juices of ripe fruit, wasp grubs are fed chiefly on chewed insects. There are, of course, wasps and waspsabout 1500 varieties, I think, altogether -and I still can’t be sure that the variety we are said to have here, German wasps, ate carnivorous, though I gather that they are to some extent. The story, if I have read it accurately, and with understanding, is that all wasps were Carnivorous once, and that fresh meat is still a "primary appetite" with wasp grubs. Wasps do not, however, paralyse insects with their stings, as ichneumon flies do, and store them whole, but tear them to pieces with their jaws, chew them into a pulp, and then feed them to their larvae as birds feed their young, the hungry grubs protruding their heads from the cells and opening their mouths. Nor does there seem to be any doubt that wasps fertilise or help to fertilise some flowers. They can’t, I gather, reach deep-seated honey, and therefore visit
chiefly those flowers which are shallow and widely opened. That, I am afraid, makes them more useful to some of our noxious weeds (fennel, hemlock, hogweed, for example) than to lucerne and clover, but they at least have sucking mouths, and in a million years will probably be able to do everything that bees do now. In the meantime they may be doing as much good as harm, if they have an unpleasant way of doing it. But I don’t thing that is the reason why the authorities have thrown up the sponge.
FEBRUARY 28
% * % NE of my problems these hot days is to keep Scamp out of tHe watertrough. It is no joke to carry 70 or 80 gallons with a bucket to the withering trees, but water has to be saved by the cup at present, and not to empty the trough once a dog has bathed in it is to doom the cows to about 36 hours of thirst before they will drink. Elsie is tougher in this matter than Betty is, and
will usually drink in about 24 hours-un-less I happen to have
powdered Scamp with gammexane. Then there is nothing for it but an hour’s hot work with a kerosene tin and an hour’s wait later for the trough to fill again. Unfortunately, gammexane lingers a long time, and dogs, even when they have suffered for their sins, forget. It is monstrous to punish a dog at 6 o’clock for a sin committed at 4 o'clock, and I have not beén lucky enough with Scamp, as I was with Tip, to catch him in the bath while I had a stick in my hand and was near enough to roar, strike and pursue in one continuous act of violence. With Tip the cure was permanent, In the same circumstances it might work with Scamp, too, but the setting so far has eluded me. It interests me all the same to note the different ways different animals have of countering heat. Cats, which are as warmly clad as dogs, and as far as I know as impervious in the skin, never enter water voluntarily. Sheep don’t and goats don’t. Cows do to a limited extent, though. their aim, I think, when they stand in water (ahd are not there simply to eat) is to escape from leg-biting flies. Horses will sometimes splash themselves with water, but as I have seen them doing it in winter as well as in summer I suspect that the splashing is a nervous reaction rather than an effort to give themselves a cold shower. Elephants, a thousand pictures prove, do take baths, both shower and plunge, while buffaloes wil! lie for hpurs nearly submerged. So will pigs, and so will deer; but since it is the males in these two places that do most of the wallowing, since they sometimes do it at night, and often in hard frosts, I am not sure that temperature is the basic factor. I have never seen a rabbit erter water except to cross it; or a hare or a ferret ot a weasel or a stoat. I am not sure about rats, which plop in and out of the water when they live in the banks of a river or creek, but in those cases I imagine that food is the attractionthat they are hunting or scavenging. Birds like baths, but vary greatly in their method of taking them, sometimes throwing the water over themselves with their wings, and sometimes squatting in it (as pigeons often do even in the coldest weather). But has anyone ever seen a hen bathing herself, or a hawk, or an owl? . ; (4 To be continued)
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19560329.2.17.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 34, Issue 869, 29 March 1956, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,368Tales of the Long Bow New Zealand Listener, Volume 34, Issue 869, 29 March 1956, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.