Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"ARTHURIAN BRITAIN"

Sir,-Maybe there are those who prefer their spring lamb served as colonial goose, and who will wash it down with vin ordinaire rather than savour it with hock, moselle, or chablis. But may such tastes be anticipated in a book review such\as appeared in your issue of January 28, where the literary discovery of the first half of this century is passed off. virtually as just another version of love and lure in Logres? The significance of the Oxford Standard Authors edition of the Winchester MS of The Works of Sir Thomas Malory is merely economic for New Zealand book buyers. Here is presented for the price of 26/- a text (less Professor Vinaver’s copious annotations) which in the Clarendon Press threevolume edition now sells in this country for £9 or so. The Times Literary Supplement of June 7, 1947, begins a two-page review of the larger edition with these words: "It was on July 23, 1934, that Mr. W. F. Oakeshott made in the library of Winchester College the most startling literary discovery of the century-a manuscript of Malory’s Arthurian romances roughly contemporary with Caxton’s print and independent of it." Sir Frederic -Kenyon, in the correspondence columns of the same issue, writes: "Professor Vinaver’s monumental edition of The Works of Sir »Thomas Malory, just published by the Clarendon Press, enables the public for the first

time to read Malory’s great work substantially as he wrote it, beforé Caxton edited and printed it." In view of such statements from such sources, and in view of the factual information available on where and when Caxton set up his presses and what works: he produced, I am wondering what your reviewer can mean by saying of the Winchester M.S., "As a publication it may be said to have beéh a Caxton firet."’

P. A.

CORNFORD

(Wellington).

(Our reviewer replies: "Yes, Mr. Cornford is quite right, and I am obliged to him, It is important to make it clear that this is not the Caxton but the Winchester version. As to

hock with lamb I regretfully differ.’’-

-Ed.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19550225.2.12.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 32, Issue 813, 25 February 1955, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
347

"ARTHURIAN BRITAIN" New Zealand Listener, Volume 32, Issue 813, 25 February 1955, Page 5

"ARTHURIAN BRITAIN" New Zealand Listener, Volume 32, Issue 813, 25 February 1955, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert