Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH

Sir,-My attention has been drawn to a recent lengthy article by Professor Slater, of Victoria College, in which he seems mainly. concerned with my broadcast statement that "research should not be supported for research’s sake, etc." I am completely unrepentant and am at least in good company since practically the same view was expressed recently by His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh in concluding his opening address to the British Association. Ido not believe that any man has the right to expect his fellows to maintain him permanently in relative comfort and security unless he is prepared to give some reasonable service in return, However, I believe that most of the apparent differences of opinion have their origin in misunderstandings almost inevitable when interpretations are based on _brief broadcast statements. Accordingly, I hope Professor Slater will visit Ruakura to see for himself my interpretation of research, I am sure he will find even more fundamental research being done there than in the University and for the same reasons as advanced by him. While I do not normally reply to newspaper correspondents, a recent letter by "E.H.O." intrigued me, since I also tend to use the same criterion of accuracy in assessing contributions on a subject with which I am relatively uneducated, and like "E,H.O." have generally found it a useful method, For his information, however, I was quite aware that the official grant for research in the University from the Education Department is £15,000. However, my information is that £5000 of this is earmarked in practice for training research personnel-really an educational function, The net figure is therefore £10,000 as a direct research contribution as stated in my broadcast. I would remind "E.H.O." that with four speakers on a twenty-minute panel, an average of five minutes per person, and a consequent necessity to summarise, it is hardly practicable to indulge, in the luxury of lengthy qualifications’ of every comment made in an im--promptu_. discussion. If time had been available, I could have gone even further than Professor Slater and "E.H.O." and pointed out that in addition to the £10,000 direct grant and the general funds available indirectly from the overall general education grant, if University personnel are really interested in research, special grants are made from other departments to certain University Schools for special applied research projects in medicine, defence and agriculture. None of these points, however, invelidate my main contention that the University should be better supplied with funds for research, ;

C. P.

McMEEKAN

Ruakura Animal Research Station.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19541001.2.12.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 31, Issue 793, 1 October 1954, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
422

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH New Zealand Listener, Volume 31, Issue 793, 1 October 1954, Page 5

UNIVERSITY RESEARCH New Zealand Listener, Volume 31, Issue 793, 1 October 1954, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert