Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LARGEST OF ALL?

by

SUNDOWNER

JULY 16

THOUGHT I was finished with bats until one emerges from my own. caves. and is captured under my own hat. But two more correspondents have written reporting colonies in or near Stewart Island, and in one case the indications seem to be that the bats survive there in hundreds. Reports like these, however, though most interesting to me personally, are

the stillest of still small voices beside the roar that reached me this:

week from New York. According to Life there is a colony of bats in Texas which blackens the roof of a cave for a quarter of a mile, numbers eight millions (I don’t know how they were counted), and takes three hours. of con‘tinuous flying to come out into the night to feed. Though the individuals are only an inch or two long, a photographer who visited the cave to get a picture had his hat (or it may have been his head, or both) nearly blown off by the cumulative blast of their wings, and was temporarily deafened by their multitudinous squeakings. Standing near the mouth of the cave as they came out was like being in the centre of a hurricane, and just as*Uncle Sam is the only man rich enough to afford the Mississippi, Texas is the only State big enough to take the daily coming and going of these bats without ‘losing its position on the map. I think I had better agree not to say any more about our own two or three hundred bats for at least a fortnight. ke ke

JULY 20

HEREVER my ewes picked up Organism K, the onlie begetter of footrot, they have given it a warm welcome. A month ago I had five or six lame sheep, only two lame enough to g0 down on their knees to feed. This morning I found four walking on three legs and five or six others noticeably

tender. All when I examined them showed swelling and heat. The

cripples showed suppuration as well, with the hoof lifted or lifting from the pad. I may be able to stop the suppuration, and get the fourth foot back on the ground, but it wee not again be a healthy foot. I know, too, that at this stage the fault is my own. I have not done what

the Department of Agriculture tells us to do, and the little I have done has not been dong with sufficient care. I have not used enough bluestone, I have not used it often enough. I have not isolated the. lame sheep. And I have not pared away all the harbouring horn in which active germs could hide. For none of these failures have I an adequate excuse. The Department has not only circulated its knowledge ‘through the Journal of Agriculture and made it available in free pamphlets. It has sent me a photograph of a foot showing lesions in the horny tissue which could not have been detected without deep paring or treated until the protective cover had been removed. Finally, it has told me about properties, one of them the most famous farm in Canterbury, on which footrot has been completely eradicated by the methods

recommended in Dr. Filmer’s bulletin. If I felt like excusing myself I could only say that I am too poor to farm efficiently-tto give myself better yards, better fences, a more effective foot-bath and draining pen. The answer would then be that I am too poor not to do those things-that muddle is the luxury of the rich.

JULY 23

* ok Eg HAVE had another note from H.M. (Dunedin), as surprising as his first but a good deal more comforting. H.M. likes authorities, and so do I, but if I felt sceptical in this case I wouid be impressed bv the

B.Sc., Ph.D., and F.R.S. of the author

of the publication from which H.M.’s quotation comes. Here it is: The coastal waters of California and of Southern Peru, Chile, Southern Argentina, the Falkland Islands, New Zealand, and Tristan da Cunha...

support the famous buoyant giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera), which is the largest plant in the world, exceeding in height even the Redwood trees of California. H.M.’s comment is that this "surely is a little known fact." My own is that if it is a fact, it is a good bracer of our morale. I have walked through the famous redwood in California that on a finer day I would have driven through, have stood at the fcot of "the world’s, highest tree’ (without feeling the height because of the low and crowded position), and I have shopped in the burnt-out bole of a redwood whose bark, leaves, and upper branches were indistinguishable from the surrounding forest of redwoods though the hole inside was 50 high and more than 30 feet across, and provided enough floor space for a_ well-stocked curiosity shop with seats, counter and shelves. If we have something bigger than those monsters, something to throw at the next American who thrusts a redwood in our face, I am all for letting the fact be known-even though we have to share the glory with six other countries, including California. But we shall have to travel some distance be--fore we eliminate the Californian lead in publicity. You don’t have to look for someone in the redwood country to tell you about the trees, You have to look for an opportunity to read the publicity matter they slip into your hands if you pause long enough to give them a chance. And it is good publicity-scien-tifically accurate and aesthetically satisfying. We have certainly got as far in New Zealand as a fence round two or three of our biggest kauris. But I can’t think of much in addition except the plates and dates on Royal plantings in our public gardens and parks. What could be more stimulating to the imagination than a kauri equivalent of this fallen redwood, with a key to the things nations were doing while the tree was growing:

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19530807.2.16.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 29, Issue 734, 7 August 1953, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,010

LARGEST OF ALL? New Zealand Listener, Volume 29, Issue 734, 7 August 1953, Page 9

LARGEST OF ALL? New Zealand Listener, Volume 29, Issue 734, 7 August 1953, Page 9

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert