THE WRITER AS OUTCAST
Sir -I enjoyed Professor Gordon’s article very much, It forced me to examine a piece on which I was engaged with detachment and doubt, and for this service I thank him. Yet I find myself in almost complete disagreement with everything he says. I take it he is bored with the childhood pieces to which so many of us are addicted, and who can blame him? Yet can he in all seriousness suggest that this is because childhood is an unsuitable field for us to explore? At what age does one become worthy of a writer’s attention? If writing is boring, the reason surely is that the writing is bad, no other. There can be nd arbitrary dismissal of a whole field of experience which we all share. As Mr. Summers suggests, the reasons for this preoccupation are much deeper than Professor Gordon allows. May I suggest, very tentatively, a hypothesis? Qur modern determinist philosophies tell us that we are merely bundles of conditioned ‘teflexes, economic or sexual propulsions, and all fashion an- image of man as victim, a being who does. not act, but is only acted upon, The ideal image for this passivity, for an aesthetic purpose, is surely a child, who clearly is not free to choose or operate his will. Further, all these philosophies insist
that their conditioning takes place in childhood; they take as first commandment that the child is father of the man. So that I find the preoccupation which distresses Professor Gordon entirely typical and suitable for our time, What we need, I feel, is not less work on childhood themes, but more. Let’s write them in hundreds, our _ tedious little ‘fopera" full of self-pity and crocodile tears, in the hope that this will prepare the ground for the emer- | gence of a major literary talent who will synthesis all these footling little essays inte one grand and definitive work after which, praise be, no more working of this particular vein will be possible. If however, after this, we are still writing works entitled: The Agony in the Woodshed, The First Awakening, or The End of Summer, I hope Professor Gordon will write to you in the sternest and most uncompromising terms.
BRUCE
MASON
(Tauranga).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19520424.2.12.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 26, Issue 668, 24 April 1952, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
376THE WRITER AS OUTCAST New Zealand Listener, Volume 26, Issue 668, 24 April 1952, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.