CARDINAL MINDSZENTY
Sir,-The theme of Professor Wood’s talk on the trial of Cardinal Mindszenty appears to be that people who oppose powerful thugs are likely to get hurt. He then proceeds carefully to consider whether jn fact the opposition was such that the thug should have taken it seriously. He draws an odd parallel with the action of democratic governments taking unusual powers in time of war against citizens who object on conscientious grounds. He solemnly points out that the non-Catholic religious authorities have so far obeyed the thug in the matter of education of children. Now, sir, as I understand it, a great part of
this question in Hungary arises from the Cardinal’s view (apart from his opposition to thuggery) that: 1. A Catholic parent has the right and duty to educate his children in the Catholic faith even if the State says otherwise. 2. If he delegates his right then the delegate or teaching authority stands in loco parentis (not in loco civitatis) to implement and protect this right. Not to state this issue plainly in the commentary seems to me like producing Hamlet and cutting entirely the part of the ghost because some of the audience don’t believe in spirits. Professor Wood can of course readily recall instances of the same conflict in every civilised and uncivilised country in the world and from the period of Nero. down to that of Calles and Hitler.
PATER
FAMILIAS
(Wellington).
Sir,-My compliments to the speaker in the "Mainly for Women" session frqgm 3YA on Friday morning, February 11, for his frank and refreshing viewpoint on the Mindszenty trial. During the past few weeks public opinion has beén subjected to the pressure of the arguments of two main lines of thought: first, that trial by a Communist court is, ipso facto, abominable, execrable, revolting to every human conscience, a comedy of Red justice, etc.; and, on the other hand, the allegation that the trial of an ecclesiastical dignitary for high treason and black market financial dealings is, in itself, the trial of the church represented by him. Well let us wait to see if those who were loudest in their condemnation of the conduct and conclusion of the trial in Budapest will be as quick in sympathy with the victims of another form of condemnation without trial-
excommunication.
E.
P.
(Wellington).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19490325.2.14.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 20, Issue 509, 25 March 1949, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
390CARDINAL MINDSZENTY New Zealand Listener, Volume 20, Issue 509, 25 March 1949, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.