Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BIG FARMS AND LTTLE

Bu

SUNDOWNER

WAS much struck by a remark made by Dr. Woodhouse ' when we were walking over one of the cultivated paddocks of Blue Cliffs. Noticing that the grass was much darker on one side of the fence than on the other side, I asked if this was the result of topdressing.

TEMPERAMENTAL PADDOCKS

"Probably," he said, "in that particu‘lar case.. But I don’t really know. It

would be ridiculous to say that paddocks have temperaments, but I’m often temp-

ted to think, that they have. the strangest things happen sometimes. Take that face. across the gully. I don’t know why the grass is always better there than east and west of it, but it is." "You mean under the same treatment?" "Yes, It gets the same treatment in every way. As far as I can judge it has: the same soil. But it always gives better results. There is a physical reason if I knew what it is, but I don’t." "So you decide in the meantime that the paddock is temperamental?" "That of course is a joke-a cloak for my ignorance. But it is not a joke to say that paddocks have their peculiarities. I can’t be sure after 25 years’ close study that I know one of them." "If you don’t, who does?" "That’s just the point. I may be duller than others or not so dull; see more or see less. But I do look, and keep on looking, and thinking." "Looking with trained eyes and thinking with a trained mind." "Well I suppose that’s true relatively. I suppose I could say that I’m partly trained-trained to the point of knowing the difference between knowledge and guesswork. But training is not enough in farming. There must be interest and devotion. If a farmer is not fond of his animals he will never get to know them. If he doesn’t watch his paddocks as affectionately as he watches changes of mood in his own children he will not get to know them eitherand that is the answer to nationalization."

"It would make farming mechanical?" "Mechanical and soulless. It’s horrible to think of land in anybody’s hands instead of in the hands of those who love it and have lived always with itsomething like having women nationalized and children reared by the State."

BIG FARM

oe * EFORE I reached Longbeach the way had been prepared for me by Mrs. Woodhouse, but I don’t think I would have been turned away if I'd arrived umannounced. I suspect that I would still have lunched on wild duck, Wiisky, fruit and

cream, and that there would have been the same

order in the house and out in the grounds, though Mrs. Grigg at the time had neither maid nor gardener. It had been raining hard, and the season was early winter, but although there was a good deal of mud on the road by which I approached the home-stead-the wrong road, I discovered — everything was as pleasant inside the cattle-stop as money, space, management, and good taste could make it. I found it embarrassing to have to confess that I had lived all my life in New Zealand without having seen New Zealand’s most famous farm. Those who don’t know the story of Longbeach can easily get to know it if they are interested. I

knew a part of it before I arrived, but it was a_ surprise to discover that I had been completely wrong about the most important fact of all-the physical foundations of the estate. Instead of the peat that I had expected to find, I found what the original John Grigg had the wit to see behind the appearances of things-trich firm land (a deep layer of soil on top of clay on top of shingle) temporarily water-logged by blocked artesian springs. Once he had cleared the bed of the Hinds river-a big job in those dayshe had only to open the springs to that wide channel to have thousands of acres of arable farm lands, with wealth in perpetuity unless individual or national folly snatched it away. Originally the estate was from the Hinds river to the Ashburton-approxi-mately 32,000 acres. To-day it is only 4,000 acres, But it is still one of the show pieces of private enterprise, and I did not find myself unsympathetic when Mr. Grigg complained-a little humorously but certainly not with calm resignation-of "the things they do to us in Wellington," I am sure-they do many things that if I were John Grigg’s grandson, I should deeply resent. But I did not come away weeping over Mr. Grigg’s pinched life, with his yearlings down to £1,500

and his home only spacious and gracious enough now for an uprooted Indian nabob. I thought "Uncle Walter," as Mr. Grigg kept calling him, had left Mr. Grigg a few feathers to fly with still, and when I said so he did not show me the gate. He showed me his "hope for the Grand National," I thought with more affection than pride, and he asked me to come back when the winter was over and see Longbeach under a summer sky. But I wish I could remember, and were free to repeat, all the droll things he said about farmers who mix husbandry and politics.

LITTLE FARM

LEFT Longbeach remembering that I had myself been reared on a square mile of country, most of it fertile, but some wet and some stony,-.and all of it hilly and cold. While my father lived the area neither grew nor shrunk, since

Nad an 0oOldfashioned belief in paying as you go,

and regarded mortgages and overdrafts as devices of the devil. How he managed to pay his way I was too young at the time to understand, but when I recall that he had 13 children, and sometimes got sixpence for wool, fourpence for butter, and seldom more than fifteen pence for oats, I can imagine now what the story must have been. My reason for mentioning it here is the fact that farms in New Zealand don’t often remain stationary in size, or in prosperity. If they don’t expand they seem somehow to contract, and I have often wondered what the reason is when they do neither. I know what the reason was in my father’s case, but he was 60 years old when he began to farm, and turned to the land when the decline of mining left him stranded in , business. The smallest farm in our district then was 170 acres, and when I passed it a (continued on next page)

(continued from previous page) week or two after my visit to Longbeach only the pine trees showed where the homestead had been. There were however several farms of 225 acres, and I was interested to. discover that one of those was still in the possession of the family who occupied it when the district was first settled, and neither bigger nor smaller, It is a hill farm, and I can still remember the heroic, and I imagine finally useless, work done by the owner in obliterating benches and‘ smoothing down sidelings with" a spade. I wonder, too, whether it has proved an advantage to get rid of the tussocks in the gullies. But all those things were done by one tough little man from Somerset, with a growing family, very little money, and no reinforcement for his muscles but two horses, with which he had no special skill, a pick, a shovel, a spade, and a hillside plough. Roads were made, swamps were drained, a dam was built, debts were paid, the family were reared, and two members, a brother and a sister, live there still in modest and philosophic comfort. It is true that neither has married, but they have been to Australia and te Europe, one of them I

think twice, and I am sure they have never owed a penny to anybody for 20 or 30 years. In their early days there. were of course rabbits to be caught and soldat early day prices (six for a shilling). There were station sheep to be shorn -at fifteen shillings a hundred. No doubt there was a little harvesting to be done (at ninepence an hour), or a day on the roads occasionally (at eight shillings). But everything else came out of that small farm, which was not overworked or over-stocked, but from a very early period was a free farm, bringing dividends in’ good years and a living at least when seasons were bad, and care-free sleep every night. Not every family would have done as well in the same circumstances, even if it had been as diligent, as cautious, and as wisely careful of expenditure. A success like that is built on character as well as on energy, on wisdom within as well as on good husbandry without. But I suspect that far more successes would come if we waited for them, and that New Zealand is paying a heavy price for the impatience of most of its farmers, their big notions, and their ambitious gambles. (To be continued)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19490114.2.17.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 20, Issue 499, 14 January 1949, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,522

BIG FARMS AND LTTLE New Zealand Listener, Volume 20, Issue 499, 14 January 1949, Page 8

BIG FARMS AND LTTLE New Zealand Listener, Volume 20, Issue 499, 14 January 1949, Page 8

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert