NEW ZEALAND COMPLACENCY.
, Sir-On a‘recent Friday night I listened at first with interest but later with a great deal of consternation to the session "Let’s Have it Out!" The debate began with Mrs. McPhail’s fluent, coherent and altogether delightfully expressed opinions of New Zealand and New Zealanders, All too seldom do we
have the opportunity in this country of hearing speakers who have the ability to express themselves with ease; and of hearing’ pleasant voices, almost never. Mrs. McPhail had both these things and her observations to my mind stamped her as an intelligent person and a competent observer. I-found nothing in her criticisms to disagree with. I was pleased to hear that she found New Zealand people so pleasant and friendly, for they can be that. But I do agree that we are self-satis-fied and complacent toa degree that we put up with poorly-made articles and that our clothes are without style. I have spent enough years away from New Zealand to know this to be true. Two New Zealand women replied to Mrs. McPhail’s interesting and helpful talk and here my consternation began. The speakers, one in particular, were fairly representative of New Zealanders. Their halting incoherence and inability to express themselves made a most unfortunate contrast, and, while denying that New Zealanders were complacent, gave a most positive exhibition of complacency. Many times the old excuse that New Zealand is a young country, just 109 years old, is offered as a reason for the poor quality of New Zealandmade goods. The truth is that the vast majority of New Zealand goods are inferior in either quality or finish and we offer no complaint. If we did, either the quality would have to improve or we should be able to purchase good quality ‘from other countries. Those articles made in New Zealand which are up to standard, woolléns, for instance, are fantastically high in price and are not, as most New Zealanders think, much better in quality than woollen goods in other countries. ‘Those who have bought woollen goods overseas will agree with this. I would like to point out, too, the number of times Mrs. McPhail was misquoted. It happened alto. gether too often and when Mrs. McPhail attempted to correct her critics, she was not given a ghost of a chance.
C.S.
E.
(Dunedin).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19480402.2.14.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 18, Issue 458, 2 April 1948, Page 16
Word count
Tapeke kupu
388NEW ZEALAND COMPLACENCY. New Zealand Listener, Volume 18, Issue 458, 2 April 1948, Page 16
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.