Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IS THE CONDUCTOR REALLY NECESSARY?

HE report that Boyd Neel occasionally leaves the conductors desk during rehearsals while the orchestra is still playing, and listens from the back of the hall may have reminded some of our readers of an article on conducting published a year or so ago and called, "You Can’t Fool the Orchestra All the Time." It was from the Saturday Review of Literature and its authors was Paul Henry Lang, editor of the American Musical Quarterly and professor of musicology at Columbia University. Lang attacked the "showmanship" with which, he said, the performances of so many conductors was overlaid: he deplored their resorting to such tricks as conducting without score or baton-purely because it had become fashionable to do so-and using exag-

gerated gestures which meant (he asserted) nothing to the orchestra, and were employed simply to impress the public. ; The other day, Boyd Neel himself was in Wellington, at the same time as Warwick Braithwaite, who is here as guest conductor of the National Orchestra, and Andersen Tyrer. So, equipped with a copy of Lang’s article, The Listener sought each of them out and obtained their opinions. on what a conductor really means to the orchestra during the actual public performance (his function at rehearsals goes without doubting), and to what extent he should take his audience into consideration as he conducts. 2% ck * AN experienced orchestral player (Lang said) can tell after a few measures whether the conductor is attending to his business or is indulging in hocuspocus for effect and will govern his playing accordingly. Because-and this is not sufficiently appreciated by the public-he can play without paying much attention to the conductor.

"It has often been suggested," said Warwick Braithwaite, "that a good orchestra can play without a conductor. This has been tried several times, but after a short while either the ‘orchestra has gone out of business or it has found a conductor who has rescued it from oblivion. There’s a wide difference between an orchestra playing quite well without a conductor ‘and a finished and artistic performance." When we ,put this point to Boyd Neel, he admitted that»although his orchestra can play by itself this would not be possible in the case of works of a complex nature. "But," he was asked, "few of the players in most orchestra ever seem to look at the conductor at all-how do you account for that?" "Believe me, they do," he replied. He turned aside in his seat and held up his hand a foot or so in front of his eyes and his gaze upon it. "I’m looking at my hand," he said, "but I can still see you. If you wave your arm I shall see you do it, even though I am not looking directly at you. That is the way in which a musician watches the conductor. He can be intent upon his music but he does not miss one move the conductor makes." Andersen Tyrer; who was approached next, was in agreement with Boyd Neel on this point. He commented: "Those who have studied music realise that every movement of a conductor who knows his job is full of purpose and significance. The orchestra instinctively Teacts to a conductor’s gestures as he draws individual players into the conception of the work which is being performed. The players may be brilliant and experienced, yet the conductor is still the keystone and the one to whom everyone else must look for inspiration and guidance." If the players saw a conductor gesticulating wildly throughout a work they would be unable to discriminate between the important and upimportant gestures and would soon be impervious to any subtleties of direction. oe * * ANOTHER aspect of the same subject on which opinions were sought was whether a conductor pays any regard to his audience while he is actually conducting. The history of conducting records instances of conductors who have faced their audience while they conducted, or have stood sideways between audience and orchestra, and’ have resorted to. many other devices calculated to draw attention to themselves. We asked Boyd Neel what he ee about it. "TI don’t think I really remember Prise there’s an audience there," he said. "If a conductor is concentrating properly upon his work he will soon forget about the audience." The other two conductors gave us the same answer and in doing so bore out Sir Adrian Boult’s shrewd words: "His (the conductor’s) work must be directed

towards the eyes of his orchestra, but only towards the ears of his audience," and the late Sir Henry J. Wood’s suggestion to aspiring conductors-that by all means they should keep their batons freshly painted with white paint so that those members of the audience who chose to do so could watch and learn, but that the actual movements of the baton should be made for the benefit of the orchestra, never for the audience. %* * * N his article, Lang stated that conducting without a score was purely a convention which started when Toscanini found his eyesight becoming too weak to permit him to distinguish the markings without very close scrutiny of the pages. Conductors seized upon this, he asserted, as a means of impressing the public with their own virtuosity and prodigious powers of memory and nowadays "consider it their duty to avoid being seen in public with a score." "Those conductors who find it easy to conduct without a score," commented Braithwaite, "still have to think in terms of artistic performance, and using a score or not has nothing to do with artistry. It is recorded by Wagner, that great admirer of Beethoven’s works, that the only good performance he heard of the latter’s Choral symphony was when he .went to Paris and heard (continued on next page)

( continued from previous page) it given under the conductor of the Academie Nationale orchestra, who conducted the symphony from a yiolin part, the inference being that he couldn’t read a conductor’s score," But Braithwaite agreed that it was an advantage to be able to dispense with a score once a work had been memorised completely and that it helped the conductor to concentrate more deeply upon his artistic conception of the work being performed. Boyd Neel told us that he conducted without a score purely because he had no need of one. His memory is excellent but he uses a score at rehearsals when he is working on a piece with which his orchestra is not familiar. Braithwaite, too, uses a score to rehearse even those works with which he is most: familiar and which he can conduct from memory any time, because (as he pointed out to us) it would be a waste of time for a conductor to attempt to commit to memory the reference letters

and marks which he has to make use of at rehearsals. As Andersen Tyrer put it, "In the score are only the more obvious marks of expression and phrasing. It is the conductor who fills in the blanks. It is he who must supply the dynamics that give the music ‘soul.’" * * * + Lang gives full credit to the conductor of opera: "The well organised symphony orchestra can muddle) through without a mishap even if it does not get much help from the. conductor. But in the opera everything depends on the conductor." Braithwaite, who has had considerable experience conducting opera in addition to his work with symphony orchestras, agreed that conducting opera from memory is far more difficult. "With singers performing from memory, mistakes can easily occur which might throw everything out and at such moments it is most comforting for the conductor to have the notes in front of him." Andersen Tyfer summed the whole thing up for us. From the one extreme of regarding the conductor as principally a showman he warned us against going to the other. "T think the main danger a conductor comes up against," he said, "is of being regarded purely as a sort of human metronome. All that the composer has left behind are the printed symbols on a page. From the tangible the conductor must create the intangible. From the black and white page he must create the essence of the music. That is why he is there, and his work at rehearsals and what he does on the concert platform should be directed téwards that end." (Listeners will hear more about the functions of the orchestral conductor in one of a series of talks recorded for the NZBS by Boyd Neel during his stay in New Zealand. Details of these broadcasts will be announced later.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19470725.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 422, 25 July 1947, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,436

IS THE CONDUCTOR REALLY NECESSARY? New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 422, 25 July 1947, Page 10

IS THE CONDUCTOR REALLY NECESSARY? New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 422, 25 July 1947, Page 10

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert