Letters About Films
Sir,-I side solidly with Phil Hayward. Far from being finished, Disney is at the begnning of a marvellous art form in which he has no equals. Each of his efforts have had extraordinary beauty and appeal in different ways. The trouble lies not with Walt Disney, but with those poorly equipped to comprehend the exquisite and _ poetical. would-be intellectuals sneer at "Silly symphony culture,’ and machineage creation. It is a foolish kind of narrowness, for original mind and idealistic inspiration are the source of this art just as of all others. Disney the poet, musician, and seer is far beyond the little zone of his critics. . . . One does S Need to have any "axes to grind" My'see that many American films are often better than other imports. It is nothing but snobbishness and affectation to favour foreign pictures. Another kind of affectation is the mania for English pictures; no matter how gauche, lurid, trashy these may be, they are invariably hailed with exaggerated fuss. Without doubt, many of them are frightfully poor. People must learn to be sensible about movie art; a film is not necessarily meretricious because it’s from Hollywood, or inevitably artistic and brilliant (and cultural) because it’s from Paris or London. Occasional Continental efforts are well done, but production is frequently clumsy, with plots hashed from plays; and the attitude to sex is always the same both in British and foreign films, either bawdy or vicious, the tired roué attitude. Sex in American films is mostly treated in gay and youthful style and with a refreshing pride in the state of love, as if it were good instead of decadent. Critics are fond of harping on the bad influence of American films. I would like to know what kind of influence in the moral way they think British films exude; the majority produced between 1945 and 1947 were on themes of rape, adultery, sadism, debauchery, and murder. I would like to add one point which I think has not been sufficiently "stressed; the, pleasant fact with American films of being able to see men who look and talk like males. In English films they attitudinize like
dummies.
LET'S BE HONEST
(Lower Hutt).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19470718.2.64.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 421, 18 July 1947, Page 33
Word count
Tapeke kupu
368Letters About Films New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 421, 18 July 1947, Page 33
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.