Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FILM CRITICS

Sir,-I think that the answer to Mr. Hayward re the Disney films is not only unnecessarily tart, coming as it does from the Editor of a journal of the standard of The Listener, but somewhat illogical too, To suggest that: Mr. Hayward cannot judge a film honestly because he deals in films and shows them to the public, is the same as saying that a man who sells bread cannot recognise a good loaf, or that an Editor cannot recognise a good story when he reads one.

TOM

BLOODWORTH

(Auckland).

(We expressed no opinion at all about Mr. Hayward’s personal capacity to judge films. We said that disinterested criticism is safer than the criticism of interested parties.-Ed.)

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19470704.2.13.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 419, 4 July 1947, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
119

FILM CRITICS New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 419, 4 July 1947, Page 5

FILM CRITICS New Zealand Listener, Volume 17, Issue 419, 4 July 1947, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert