é Sir-I confess that I was somewhat disappointed in your leading article on H. G. Wells. However, contrary to the opinion of GH.D. I prefer to believe that, you intended "Homo Sapiens" to mean "wise man." Certainly the name is futile when applied to the human race as a whole. It is sometimes wise to be violemt. Jesus, for example, did not suffer fools gladly; even he drove the jackals from the Temple before the whip lash. It is perhaps because the restrained, scholarly eremite is too ineffectual; too aloof, to influence the common tun of man, that G-H.D. prefers this type of "wise man." Certainly Wells’ enemies are mostly those who hoped that their "omnipotent God" would humble this disturbing iconoclast, but were disappointed. Wells, almost from his "teens, was a man with a mission, a mission to produce World Order from World Chaos; equality and universal plenty from the horrors of class and monetary distinction; to do this without authoritarianism, by combining individual freedom with co-ordinated intelligent resourcefulness which he labelled Collective Mind. To achieve this for men he toiled through his life. His attacks on religion, snobbery, outworn conventions, and other humbug were incidental to this greater aim. These impeded those advances which the prophet believed could make mankind happier. He abominated the hypocritic sanctity of commercialised Christendom; a view shared to-day by notable English clerics; even more, he detested the inflexibility of obsolete rituals in Church and State. To describe Wells’ fight for "the unlimited right ... to think, discuss and suggest" as a "battering down of open doors" is wilful myopia. It was_no thug whom Anatole France described as "the greatest intellectual force in the Eng-lish-Speaking World." It was no fool who at the dawn of this century predicted the horror of Atomic Warfare; nor was there any meanness of spirit in the man who said "For the greater part of: my life I have given most of my working time to the problem of the human. future."
G. A.
McCRACKEN
(Auckland).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19461025.2.14.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 383, 25 October 1946, Page 17
Word count
Tapeke kupu
336Untitled New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 383, 25 October 1946, Page 17
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.