American's Survey Draws Fire from Moscow
HERE is nothing the rest of the world wants to know more than the home truth about Russia. But Russia does not want it to be known. Its Government will neither tell the story itself nor allow anyone else to tell it. Though foreign correspondents are admitted, they are not admitted freely enough to cover such a vast country, and they are not given free enough access to the news they most want to know. The result is that most reports from Russia are incomplete and most of the comment guess-work. However, the "New York Times" was able recently to print a report by Brooks Atkinson, one of its correspondents, who had spent ten months in Moscow, accompanied by his wife. It was not a sensational report, except in its implications, and most of the readers of the "Times" would regard it as not unfriendly. But it gave deep offence in Russia. Here are some extracts:
N the attempt to establish workable relations with -the Government of the Soviet Unjon.we have to abandon the familiar concepts of friendship. Friendship in the sense of intimate association and political compromise is not wanted, is not possible and is not involved. . .. The Russian people are admirable people. ... But between us and the Russian people stands the Soviet Government. Despite its use of the word "democracy" it is a totalitarian Government. The familiar dictatorship of the proletariat is actually the dictatorship of the 13 members of the Politburo of the Communist Party. There are no freedoms inside the Soviet Union. As far as I know, the Government is not imposed on the people against their will, nor is it a corrupt Government that puts the personal interests of any one group ahead of what are regarded as the true interests of the State. Despite many internal disorders and disloyalties’. . . the people of the Soviet Union generally trust and respect the wisdom and integrity of their leaders . . . Not Enemies, Not Friends But, by nature, the Government is a machine for generating power inside the Soviet Union and as far outside as the power can be made to extend; and all attempts to deal with it in terms of friendship are doomed to failure. Although we are not enemiés, we are not friends; and the most we can hope for is an armed peace for the next few years. Where our interests lie, we have to apply equal power in the opposite direction. This is the most reactionary method of arranging world affairs. But the spirit of the Soviet Government is fundamentally reactionary, as_ its attitude toward defeated nations and the behaviour of the Red Army in Manchuria suggest. Although the most violent period of the Soviet revolution has probably passed, a streak of violence perists. No one knows how many million political prisoners are now living in jail of in exile. The estimates run all the way from 10,000,000 to 15,000,000... ‘To survive (the Soviet Government) believes that it must be free to conduct its affairs in secret and act swiftly, by force if necessary. As: far as a foreigner can tell, the Soviet leaders are in a strong position.
They have led their people to a remarkable victory over an_ efficient, modern foe; and the Communist Party is naturally taking full credit for winning the war-in various degrees ignoring the contributions the other allies made to the defeat of Germany, and taking credit for the knockout blow against Japan . . . But it is not in the nature of men like members of the Politburo to feel secure. As leaders of a backward, poorly fed, loosely organ* ised country that is trying to. lift itself by its bootstraps in a hurry, they have many unpleasant duties to perform and many labours to lay on the backs of their people. No doubt they feel that the circumstances require that they have freedom to act at the top without criticism, opposition .or observation. Although their motives may be above suspicion, they behave instinctively like conspirators ... The spirit of the Soviet Government is anti-foreign. Ever since the bloody purges of 1936 there has been a* nameless terror about foreigners, who are regarded as spies and enemies. The leaders imagine that every man’s hand is against them; they imagine that they are surrounded. And, of course, there is no more certain way of arousing first the bewilderment, then the contempt, and finally the enmity of other nations. In view of the size, strength, courage and inexhaustible resources of the Soviet Union, this phobia about being trapped and cramped would be hilarious, if it were not so troublesome to foreigners who want to find some way of getting on withthe Soviet Union... Socialism vy. Capitalism The most formidable impediment to amicable international relations is the basic. fact that the Soviet Union is a socialist state developing and expanding in a capitalist world. According to the Communist party line, the Soviet is not secure from aggression so long as capitalist countries like the U.S. and Great Britain also hold dominant positions in the world .... In my opinion, socialism, in itself is not the source of the trouble between the Soviet Union and the U.S. and Great Britain. Other things being equal, the two Western democracies could get on with the Soviet Union more profitably than Nazi Germany did during the period of the fraudulent pact of friendship. Indeed, I expect that they will. But that is not the point of view of the Soviet leaders. They regard themselves as custodians of the, future of
the world. In their opinion, everything is going their way, as leaders of a socialist state with a Communist goal, they régard themselves as the advance agents of manifest destiny. The Law and the Prophets For Communism is not only a political science but a religion, and its conduct is governed by dogmas as well as by reason ... The modern icons are the heroic statues and portraits of Lenin and Stalin in every public building and the huge portraits of the minor prophets carried by the believing multitudes on holidays... The parish letters to the faithful, which are the leaders on the front pages of the newspapers, solemnly declare that the Soviet Union is the most blessed ration in the world be cause it has embraced the one and only true faith, and that the future will overflow with love, joy and singing. When the Soviet representatives meet ours at the conference table they are in effect meeting the last tottering princes of original sin; and yet they cannot give way to us without yielding divine principle. That is one reason why the Russians are so difficult to get on with in pagan assemblies that do not worship Marx, Lenin and Stalin... Despite all these impediments to pleasant and easy relations, the Russians really do not want to lose friends throughout the world, nor build up resistance. They do not want to defy ‘world opinion ... The Russian people are sincere and good-hearted. It is a pity, perhaps it will be a tragedy, that as a nation we have to live with the Russian nation in an atmosphere of bitterness and tension. But we have to. There is no other way."
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19460920.2.17.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 378, 20 September 1946, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,208American's Survey Draws Fire from Moscow New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 378, 20 September 1946, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.