Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

University Lecturer

"LJNDER the present social and economic set-up I’m definitely not in favour of equal pay for equal work,"

said L. S. Hearnshaw, Lecturer in Psychology, Victoria University College. "I don’t say that on the ground of differences between the sexes-I think the sexes are more or less equally endowed, and some women are superior to men, while some men are superior to women, in particular ways. For instance, in general men are better at mathematics and women are better at languages, and fine manual dexterity and so on; and then, of course, there’s the difference in ordinary physical strength, but I. think these. differences simply indicate that people should have jobs that suit them. It’s when we come to the social side, and consider the worker’s responsibilities, that the difficulties arise. I must say I’m completely unconvinced by some of the arguments about women with dependants that have been brought up by those who favour equal pay. I don’t say there’s been any deliberate attempt to mislead, but I do think there’s a big difference between those whom we regard as a man’s dependants and those whose income is supplemented by a contribution from a single woman’s salary. I saw figures which treated the two things as if they were the same, and they left me unconvinced. "Another thing is that I think the incentives against marriage would be very great if marriage meant halving the in-come-as it would if men and women received equal pay and then were faced with accepting only one salary after marriage. I don’t think work after marriage is a practical thing for a woman except purely as a temporary measure, and I think it will remain impracticable until we can get some fully organised system of domestic assistance. "I advocate equal pay for equal work with heavy deductions from the earnings for single workers, plus a really adequate system of family allowances. But at present I think we’ve got to insist that the male has vastly greater responsibilities. If we merely established a@ principle of equal pay for equal work, there would be very undesirable consequences, which would strike at the basis of the family and that’s the most important social unit."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19460517.2.15.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 360, 17 May 1946, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

University Lecturer New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 360, 17 May 1946, Page 6

University Lecturer New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 360, 17 May 1946, Page 6

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert