Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FUNCTION OF THE FILMS

Sir-I have read the article by Samuel Goldwyn in your issue of July 6. It is a commonplace now thatthe film is the-most powerful conditioning mechanism in modern society. The power vested in Mr. Goldwyn and his colleagues is therefore plenary, incalculable. What qualifications has he for bearing this enormous responsibility? I say, unreservedly, none. His article is a piece of sententious humbug. "A picture’s first function is to entertain." Mr. Goldwyn deceives himself. As it is, in Hollywood the first and last function of the film is profit-making. Entertainment? Certainly, because without it, no audience, no profit. The film has a single problem: to. render through its photographic technique a vision of life, and.to render it truly. It sounds dull fare, no doubt.. What of entertainment? I say simply. this: that whatever is truly. and artistically. rendered through any medium, must’ of its nature be entertaining. The present" limited meaning given to entertainment as something merely amusirig or diverts» ing is a debased usage. And Mr. Gold-~ wyn’s less than adroit rationalising about direct entertainment and indirect educa--tion does not bear close scrutiny. If the entertainment is true, it must be educational also, in the purest and ‘most complete form. But Hollywood, for the most part, is not interested in truth unless it pays dividends. Taken as a whole, its values . ate commercial and rankly materialist. Why, then, are they accepted with such avidity? Because society itself is commercial and rankly materialist. The film mirrors, a it rarely States, = Sette or frustrations of inc in decay. on Se like ‘to ee lieve in Mr.. Goldwyan’s eloquent plea for. .

"honest" films. But he states that Amerie cans may learn about English ‘courage from, Mrs. Miniver and The White Cliffs of Dover, about history from Wilson and Gone With the Wind, and I therefore find it impossible to take him seriously, _ And yet he must be-taken seriously, for Samuel Goldwyn is. a movie mogul, inheritor of the earth, a czar of the universe.

BRUCE

MASON

(Wellington). —

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19450803.2.13.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 13, Issue 319, 3 August 1945, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

FUNCTION OF THE FILMS New Zealand Listener, Volume 13, Issue 319, 3 August 1945, Page 5

FUNCTION OF THE FILMS New Zealand Listener, Volume 13, Issue 319, 3 August 1945, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert