Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SABOTEUR

(Universal)

LFRED Hitchcock’s latest thriller begins with an explosion and_a fire in a big Pacific- Coast aircraft. factory. It ends 100 minutes later

with a Fifth Columnist slipping horribly, inch by inch, from the giant, torch-hold-ing hand of the Statue of Liberty in New York harbour. In between these two points of time and distance, various characters have been shot at, sandbagged and kidnapped; the hero has leapt off a bridge into a swirling river and has escaped various other forms of death and disaster by inches; and attempts have been made to blow up Boulder Dam and a battleship at its launching. When the light go up, any member of the audience who has been able to survive Hitchcock’s Hundred Minutes without feeling slightly limp from suspense and excitement should be fit to qualify without further test, as a parachute trooper or one-man submarine crew. Every trick in Hitchcock’s repertoire has gone to the making of Saboteur. Not many of them are brand-new, some are slightly worn. or over-worked, and one or two fail to come off. But these clever devices of the old master are enough to turn what, in other hands, might have heen iust a routine thriller into a

first-rate melodrama-a motion picture which seldom forgets to move, even when its characters are merely talking. The director is so much the star of this film that it wasn’t necessary to crowd the cast with big names. Robert Cummings portrays the young worker in the aircraft factory who is wrongly accused of setting fire to the plant, and who sets out to track down the. Axis agent (Norman Lloyd), who is really responsible. Bewildered but determined, he uncovers an elaborate sabotage organisation, and follows a trail which takes him right across the American continent. On the way, he meets the heroine (Priscilla Lane), is befriended by a blind recluse and a troupe of circus freaks, falls into the hands of the police and out again, into the hands of the Fifth Columnists and not so easily out again. Hitchcock is sometimes so anxious to pull off a trick and pack in an extra ounce of excitement that he leaves his audience guessing as to which turn the story has taken in its headlong course. And once, anyway, I think that the suspense fizzled out. There is a terrific build-up of anxiety when the hero and heroine find themselves among the Best People at a patriotic’ function in New York, only to realise that they are nevertheless still trapped by their enemies, and that nobody will believe their story that their hostess is an Axis agent, and that the immaculate gentleman over there talking to the general is planning to blow up a battleship, It is a nightmarish situation, and how the director could have rounded it off better I don’t quite know. But the present dénouement strikes me as tame. Well to the fore all through the film -lis the familiar Hitchcock technique of investing apparently innocent objects and. people with sinister meaning and purpose. This time it is mostly people: the villains of Saboteur are not deep-dyed desperadoes, but seem-

ingly respectable citizens. Fifth Columnists and Fascist sympathisers, as Hitchcock points out, are seldom gbvious: they are more likely to be drawn from the cream of society than from the scum of the gutter. So the head of the sabotage ring (Otto Kruger), is a rich, respected ranch-owner, who frankly admits that he sides with the Axis because it offers more chance for his type of rugged individualism to flourish; one of his chief assistants is a mildmannered, soft-spoken fellow, who seems incapable of violence (Alan Baxter); another is a dowager, who hob-nobs with generals and diplomats. Nearly all of them are fond of children and family life: even one of the more ordinary villains expresses the hope that he will soon be able to dispose of the heroine (whom he is guarding), because he wants to take his kid sister to a concert! It is this kind of casual, horrifying understatement that makes Sabofteur, not by any means the best of all Hitchcock pictures, but by far the most intelligent and at the same time most exciting film of its type for a good many months.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19430625.2.32.1.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 9, Issue 209, 25 June 1943, Page 13

Word count
Tapeke kupu
712

SABOTEUR New Zealand Listener, Volume 9, Issue 209, 25 June 1943, Page 13

SABOTEUR New Zealand Listener, Volume 9, Issue 209, 25 June 1943, Page 13

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert